Distinct systems for automatic and cognitively controlled time measurement: evidence from neuroimaging.

By PA Lewis, R. Miall. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 2003

845 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/62951738e4a28161cace5a7097e368df37cc2f8b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

Citations in the corpus

Neuroanatomical and Neurochemical Substrates of Timing (2011, background): “…an extended corticostriatal network, encompassing BG and, predominantly right-lateralized, prefrontal, superior temporal, and inferior parietal cortices (see, eg, Coull et al, 2004, 2008a; Ferrandez et al, 2003; Lewis and Miall, 2003a; Morillon et al, 2009; Rao et al, 2001; Shih et al, 2009).”
Role of hyperactive cerebellum and motor cortex in Parkinson's disease (2007, background): “relatively automatic movements, or discrete movements that require initiation and termination and are more under cognitive control with increased demands on cortical and subcortical areas (Lewis and Miall, 2003; Schaal et al., 2004).”
When the brain plays music: auditory–motor interactions in music perception and production (2007, background): “It has been proposed that the basal ganglia and possibly the SMA may be more important for interval timing at longer timescales (1 second and above), whereas the cerebellum may be more important for controlling motor timing at shorter timescales (millisecond”
Timing in the absence of clocks: encoding time in neural network states. (2007, background): “Recent studies have begun to examine the neural (Kilgard and Merzenich , 2002; Hahnloser et al., 2002; Leon and Shadlen, 2003) and anatomical (Rao et al., 2001; Lewis and Miall, 2003; Coull et al., 2004) correlates of temporal processing.”
The image of time: A voxel-wise meta-analysis (2010, methodology): “Although this hypothesis has received considerable support (Kagerer et al., 2002; Coslett et al., 2009; Mangels et al., 1998, Lewis and Miall, 2003b ), the issue remains controversial.”
The neural representation of time. (2004, background): “Two recent reviews have summarized this work [3,37].”
The Neural Basis of Timing: Distributed Mechanisms for Diverse Functions (2018, background): “, 2015), and imaging (Lewis and Miall, 2003) studies suggest that discriminating a short interval (e.”
Dedicated and intrinsic models of time perception. (2008, background): “Other dedicated models avoid localization issues by postulating that the representation of time results from activity across a network of regions [34, 35 ] (Figure 1b).”
Timing and time perception: A review of recent behavioral and neuroscience findings and theoretical directions (2010, positive): “…the processing of smaller intervals is sensory based, or benefits from some automatic processing, whereas the processing of longer intervals requires the support of cognitive resources (Hellström & Rammsayer, 2004; Lewis & Miall, 2003b; Rammsayer & Lima, 1991; but see Rammsayer & Ulrich, 2005).”