Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health

By Michelle Campbell, R. Fitzpatrick, A. Haines, A. Kinmonth, P. Sandercock, D. Spiegelhalter, P. Tyrer. 2000

3,499 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Rehabilitation

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

In Rehabilitation

Citations in the corpus

Should We Trust Algorithms? (2020, background): “…medical interventions may be relevant; the original (very highly cited) proposal closely followed the staged pharmaceutical model described above (Campbell et al., 2000), but a revised version moved to a more iterative model with a reduced emphasis on experimental methods (Craig et al., 2008),…”
The use of artificial neural networks in decision support in cancer: A systematic review (2006, positive): “Such a framework has been published (Campbell et al., 2000) and adapted for the development of intelligent decision support in an earlier review (Lisboa, 2002).”
Effectiveness of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) programme for people with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: cluster randomised controlled trial (2008, methodology): “The development, piloting, and subsequent randomised controlled trial of the diabetes education and self management for ongoing and newly diagnosed (DESMOND) structured education programme aimed to tackle this gap. The work followed the Medical Research Council framework,”
Design and Evaluation in eHealth: Challenges and Implications for an Interdisciplinary Field (2007, methodology): “There is little awareness of software lifecycle models among typical health services researchers, yet these are highly compatible with phased approaches to drug development and the evaluation of complex interventions in health care, which emphasize the need for exploratory, explanatory, and pragmati”
Why Are Health Care Interventions Delivered Over the Internet? A Systematic Review of the Published Literature (2006, methodology): “This should involve exploratory work and more explicit use of existing theory and modeling [ 78 ].”
Interventions to change health behaviours: evidence-based or evidence-inspired? (2004, methodology): “This implies, for example, that, what Campbell et al. (2000) refer to as ‘‘modelling’’ in their framework for the evaluation of complex interventions, may itself involve multiple evaluation studies in order to identify components or techniques that are critical to intervention effectiveness.”
Current issues and future directions in Psychology and Health : Towards a cumulative science of behaviour change: Do current conduct and reporting of behavioural interventions fall short of best practice? (2007, background): “Rather, advancing the science of behaviour change depends on the accumulation of evidence for theory-based interventions targeting specific health-related behaviours (Campbell et al., 2000; Michie, Rothman, & Sheeran, 2007).”
An Experimental Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior (2009, background): “Chatzisarantis and Hagger (2005) tested two persuasive communications targeting salient vs.”