Should We Trust Algorithms?

By David J. Spiegelhalter. 2020

59 citations recorded by the source corpus.

There is increasing use of algorithms in the health care and criminal justice systems, and corresponding increased concern with their ethical use. But perhaps a more basic issue is whether we should believe what we hear about them and what the algorithm tells us. It is illuminating to distinguish between the trustworthiness of claims made about an algorithm, and those made by an algorithm, which reveals the potential contribution of statistical science to both evaluation and ‘intelligent transparency.’ In particular, a four-phase evaluation structure is proposed, parallel to that adopted for pharmaceuticals.Keywords: trustworthiness, evaluation, AI, criminal justice system, medical AI, transparency.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Health Informatics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, AI Ethics, Fairness & Society, Philosophy

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

  1. Lesia Semenova
  2. Chudi Zhong
  3. Zhi Chen
  4. Haiyang Huang
  5. Cynthia Rudin
  6. Tong Wang
  7. Octavio Loyola-González
  8. Berk Ustun

In Health Informatics

  1. Zhi Chen
  2. Lesia Semenova
  3. Chudi Zhong
  4. Haiyang Huang
  5. Cynthia Rudin
  6. Octavio Loyola-González
  7. Timo Speith
  8. S. Lo Piano

In Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

  1. Cynthia Rudin

In AI Ethics, Fairness & Society

  1. Lesia Semenova
  2. Chudi Zhong
  3. Zhi Chen
  4. Haiyang Huang
  5. Cynthia Rudin
  6. Octavio Loyola-González
  7. Adrian Weller
  8. Yuval Pinter

Citations in the corpus