Nucleus–Cytosol Interactions—A Source of Stoichiometric Error in Flow Cytometric Estimation of Nuclear DNA Content in Plants

By M. Noirot, P. Barre, J. Louarn, C. Duperray, S. Hamon. 2000

100 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Genetics, Molecular Biology, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61d0009a567643dcecc17c1a849b3078bf6a00ff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Genetics

1. J. Loureiro
2. C. Santos
3. E. Rodriguez
4. J. Doležel
5. J. Bartoš
6. J. van Staden

In Molecular Biology

1. J. Loureiro
2. C. Santos
3. E. Rodriguez
4. J. Doležel
5. J. van Staden
6. Todd P. Michael
7. R. Kerstetter
8. Wenqin Wang

In Plant Science

1. J. Loureiro
2. C. Santos
3. E. Rodriguez
4. J. Doležel
5. J. Bartoš
6. J. van Staden
7. Todd P. Michael
8. R. Kerstetter

Citations in the corpus

• Two new nuclear isolation buffers for plant DNA flow cytometry: a test with 37 species. (2007, background): “…in samples of similar or higher quality than those obtained with WPB. Woody plants are considered recalcitrant for DNA flow cytometry as their tissues often contain cytosolic compounds that interfere with fluorescent staining of nuclear DNA (Noirot et al., 2000, 2005; Loureiro et al., 2006b).”
• Plant DNA flow cytometry and estimation of nuclear genome size. (2005, background): “The cytosol of Coffea exhibited a less dramatic effect on petunia nuclei (Noirot et al., 2000).”