Beyond global sociosexual orientations: a more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships.

By L. Penke, Jens B. Asendorpf. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2008

1,047 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Marketing

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61ca6c2dbaacecd237bfc298ebcd6a12e5f00231

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

In Marketing

Citations in the corpus

Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men's traits (2013, methodology): “To control for the effects of sociosexual psychology on sexual behavior, we reran analyses involving mating success including the summed attitudes and desires components of the SOI-R.”
A comparison of polyamorous and monoamorous persons: are there differences in indices of relationship well-being and sociosexuality? (2013, background): “Although originally conceptualised as a global construct, Penke and Asendorpf (2008) proposed and validated a three-dimensional model of sociosexuality consisting of (1) past behaviour (i.”
A life history approach to understanding the Dark Triad (2012, methodology): “Similar factor analytic results were obtained when the facets of the MACH-IV (Hunter et al., 1982), the Aggression Questionnaire (Buss & Perry, 1992), and the SOI-R (Penke & Asendorpf, 2008) were used instead of their total scores, as well as when an alternative factor solution was used for the NPI ”
From Dating to Mating and Relating: Predictors of Initial and Long–Term Outcomes of Speed–Dating in a Community Sample (2011, methodology): “…to 9 ¼ PhD), monthly income (), sociosexuality as measured by the nine-item revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (men a ¼ .84, women a ¼ .83) (SOI-R; Penke & Asendorpf, 2008; Penke, in press), the dimensions of the Five Factor Model (FFM) of personality neuroticism (men a ¼ .86, women a ¼…”
Evolution and human motivation: A fundamental motives framework (2017, background): “…the extent to which specific physical and dispositional traits are desired in a mate; Simpson & Gangestad, 1992), courtship behaviors (e.g., flirting; Penke & Asendorpf, 2008), and a wide range of other phenomena in the mating domain (for an overview, see Simpson, Wilson, & Winterheld, 2004).”
Who Benefits From Casual Sex? The Moderating Role of Sociosexuality (2014, methodology): “This study examines the moderating role of sociosexuality, a personality trait reflecting one’s willingness to engage in uncommitted sexual relationships (Penke & Asendorpf, 2008; Simpson & Gangestad, 1991).”
Humans show mate copying after observing real mate choices. (2010, result): “Since self-perceptions of mate value and attractiveness relate to the amount of prior mating success in men (Penke & Asendorpf, 2008, Study 1), this corresponds to Waynforth's (2007) conclusions that mate copying is used more by sexually inexperienced individuals (and to similar findings in…”
Is the Relationship Between Pathogen Avoidance and Ideological Conservatism Explained by Sexual Strategies (2015, methodology): “Other readily available instruments (e.g., the SOI; the PVD Germ Aversion factor) do not confound pathogen and sexual content.”
Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness (2011, methodology): “The match between assumed and actual reciprocity is, however, extremely espondence to: Mitja D. Back, Department of Psychology, Johannes berg-University Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany. l: back@uni-mainz.de ight # 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. estimate whether they are chosen by others or not (mate value”
Revisiting the Red Effect on Attractiveness and Sexual Receptivity: No Effect of the Color Red on Human Mate Preferences (2016, methodology): “Irrespective of condition, all participants responded to the attitude facet of the revised Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI-R) to control for differing sexual attitudes (Penke & Asendorpf, 2008; Cronbach’s a ¼ .83).”
More than just a pretty face: Men's priority shifts toward bodily attractiveness in short-term versus long-term mating contexts (2010, methodology): “Traits associated with SOI-R (Thornhill & Gangestad, 2008) and traits associated with parenting effort (Roney, Hanson, Durante, & Maestripieri, 2006) may be expressed in unequal concentrations across a man's face and body.”
Attached to monogamy? Avoidance predicts willingness to engage (but not actual engagement) in consensual non-monogamy (2015, methodology): “Previous research has established that these three components of sexuality are distinguishable and may even have different biological profiles (Edelstein, Chopik, & Kean, 2011), but that they operate together (e.g., Penke & Asendorpf, 2008; Rempel & Baumgartner, 2003).”