Why Mate Choices are not as Reciprocal as we Assume: The Role of Personality, Flirting and Physical Attractiveness

By M. Back, L. Penke, S. Schmukle, Karoline A. Sachse, P. Borkenau, Jens B. Asendorpf. 2011

91 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/85112530e272ab4fad4e1ee37db2438119ade1c5

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. C. Wrzus
2. Matthias R. Mehl
3. Gary J. Lewis
4. David I. Perrett
5. Carmen E. Lefevre
6. L. Penke
7. M. Back
8. Tal Yarkoni

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. C. Wrzus
2. Gary J. Lewis
3. Carmen E. Lefevre
4. David I. Perrett
5. Matthias R. Mehl
6. L. Penke
7. M. Back
8. D. Puts

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Gary J. Lewis
2. Carmen E. Lefevre
3. C. Wrzus
4. Matthias R. Mehl
5. David I. Perrett
6. L. Penke
7. Barış Özener

Citations in the corpus

• Lab And/Or Field? Measuring Personality Processes and Their Social Consequences (2015, background): “…speed-dating protocols (Asendorpf et al., 2011; Berrios et al., 2015; Finkel & Eastwick, 2008; Finkel et al., 2007), self-introductions to peers (Back et al., 2011c), dyadic (Aron et al., 1997; Funder & Sneed, 1993; Ickes, 1983; 1993) or triadic (Letzring et al., 2006) interaction tasks,…”
• Telling facial metrics: facial width is associated with testosterone levels in men (2013, methodology): “We used predicted female choice instead of actual female choices because the two variables were not correlated (r = .12, p = .12; see Back et al., 2011a for details) and thus only perceived mating success should be expected to have an effect on testosterone levels; 3) Average flirting behaviour of…”