Quantifying the strength and form of sexual selection on men's traits
By A. K. Hill, J. Hunt, Lisa L. M. Welling, R. Cárdenas, Michelle A. Rotella, J. Wheatley, Khytam Dawood, Mark D. Shriver, D. Puts. 2013
184 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/72260c2ec05df54105675410e0c47855d0ffbd7f
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Sex differences in sports interest and motivation: An evolutionary perspective. (2015, unknown): “Other evidence also supports the idea that female mate choice, although important at times, would have often been less crucial to men’s mating success than direct contests for status with other men (Hill et al., 2013; Llaurens et al., 2009; Puts, 2010).”
- The relative importance of intra- and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits (2018, unknown): “Moreover, we predict that perceived physical dominance, but not rated sexual attractiveness, will mediate the association between both objective traits and subjective ratings, and mating success (Hill et al., 2013).”
- Human sexual selection (2016, background): “In addition, some evidence indicates that men’s mating and reproductive success are more strongly linked to dominance and status among men than attractiveness to women [33 ,43].”