Actual land demand of Austria 1926–2000: a variation on Ecological Footprint assessments

By K. Erb. 2004

187 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Measuring telecouplings in the global land system: A review and comparative evaluation of land footprint accounting methods (2015, unknown): “1 Not to be confused with the land footprint, which in contrast to the Ecological Footprint accounts for actual land (see, e.g., Erb, 2004).”
Human appropriation of natural capital: A comparison of ecological footprint and water footprint analysis (2009, methodology): “ Erb (2004) for example shows how the EF of Austria refers to land appropriation on each continent of the world.”
National Footprint and Biocapacity Accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method (2005, background): “As computers’ computational capacity increases and more detailed bilateral trade statistics become accessible, future accounts may trace trade between specific countries. ( Erb, 2004 ).”
A distinct urban biogeochemistry? (2006, background): “Recent footprint modifications separate out water, food, or waste footprints [7] and account for variable productivity of land [ 8 ,16].”
Tracing distant environmental impacts of agricultural products from a consumer perspective (2011, unknown): “Erb et al. (2002) and Gavrilova et al.”