Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber

By D. Nalle, Claire A. Montgomery, J. Arthur, Stephen Polasky, Nathan H. Schumaker. 2004

232 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/61700b7c5c038d67148e94980e7c09335069d57e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

Citations in the corpus

Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services to inform marine spatial planning (2013, background): “[49] examine a three 141 dimensional tradeoff for timber production and conservation of two wildlife species using a 142”
Setting Conservation Priorities (2009, background): “When we vary the relative importance of protecting biodiversity versus protecting ecosystem services through its full spectrum, we define a “Pareto-frontier”: the best landscape outcomes achievable for any two-criteria optimization (Nalle et al. 2004).”
Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns (2008, background): “…species or small set of species and a single economic activity such as forestry (e.g., Montgomery et al., 1994; Haight, 1995; Hof and Bevers, 1998; Marshall et al., 2000; Calkin et al., 2002; Moilanen and Cabeza , 2002; Nalle et al., 2004; Strange et al., 2006a,b; Holzkamper and Seppelt, 2007).”
Evaluating cost-effectiveness of conservation management actions in an agricultural landscape on a regional scale (2007, background): “An increasing number of interdisciplinary studies considering both conservation goals and economic constraints emerged, many of them dealing with problems of optimum reserve site selection (Haight, 1995; Hof and Raphael, 1997; Moilanen and Cabeza, 2002; Nalle et al., 2004; Polasky et al.,”
Policies for Habitat Fragmentation: Combining Econometrics with GIS-Based Landscape Simulations (2007, methodology): “In these analyses, and in related optimization studies (e.g., Nalle et al. 2004), a social planner selects parcels to be included in the reserve, constrained only by the opportunity cost of the land.”
Jointness in production and farmers' willingness to supply non-marketed ecosystem services (2007, background): “Z activity or technical interdependence where Y benefits (see Boisvert, 2001, pp. 118–119; Nilsson, 2004, p. 32).”
Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “…Iwasa et al. 2007), habitat protection and restoration (Ando et al. 1998; Balmford et al. 2000; Montgomery et al. 1994, 1999; Naidoo et al. 2006; Nalle et al. 2004; Polasky et al. 2005, 2008; Wu et al. 2003), biodiversity (Brock & Xepapadeas 2003, Polasky & Solow 1995, Simpson et al. 1996), and…”
CONSERVING SPECIES IN A WORKING LANDSCAPE: LAND USE WITH BIOLOGICAL AND ECONOMIC OBJECTIVES (2005, background): “…evaluating both species persistence and economic returns focused on a single or small set of species and a single economic activity such as forestry (Montgomery et al. 1994, Haight 1995, Hof and Bevers 1998, Marshall et al. 2000, Calkin et al. 2002, Moilanen and Cabeza 2002, Nalle et al. 2004).”
The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss (2009, background): “This literature focuses on cases with asymmetric information, such as when landowners have better info mation than the conservation agency about the opportunity cost of conservation on private land.”