The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss

By D. Lewis, Andrew J. Plantinga, E. Nelson, Stephen Polasky. 2009

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/062bec9eede8e8488215dcbcba519460ea3093eb

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Kathleen Segerson
2. Stephen Polasky
3. E. Nelson
4. D. Pennington
5. Kris A. Johnson
6. Rajendra Prasad Shrestha
7. Sunsanee Arunyawat

In Global and Planetary Change

1. Stephen Polasky
2. E. Nelson
3. D. Pennington
4. Kris A. Johnson
5. Kathleen Segerson
6. Rajendra Prasad Shrestha
7. Sunsanee Arunyawat

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Kathleen Segerson
2. Kris A. Johnson
3. E. Nelson
4. Stephen Polasky
5. D. Pennington

Citations in the corpus

• Integrating Ecology and Economics in the Study of Ecosystem Services: Some Lessons Learned (2009, background): “In addition, empirical studies and simulations show that using biological information to target incentives can improve performance (e.g., Lewis et al. 2009, Nelson et al. 2008).”
• The Impact of Land-Use Change on Ecosystem Services, Biodiversity and Returns to Landowners: A Case Study in the State of Minnesota (2011, background): “…et al. 2008; Sánchez-Azofeifa et al. 2007), and analysis of the impact of alternative policy design on the provision of ecosystem services at landscape scales (e.g., Lewis et al. 2010; Nelson et al. 2008) will help improve policy aimed at increasing the net social value of services from ecosystems.”
• NEW DIRECTIONS FOR URBAN ECONOMIC MODELS OF LAND USE CHANGE: INCORPORATING SPATIAL DYNAMICS AND HETEROGENEITY (2010, unknown): “This approach has been used, for example, to study the impacts of conservation payments on landowner decisions and biodiversity loss (Lewis et al., 2009), the effectiveness of targeting strategies on land conservation (Newburn, Berck, and Merenlender, 2006) and the effect of land use policies on wat”
• Parks versus PES: Evaluating direct and incentive-based land conservation in Mexico (2017, unknown): “Lewis et al. (2011) evaluates different types of voluntary incentive policies for biodiversity conservation in comparison to a fully efficient solution. to be located on land with lower risk of deforestation due to political economy constraints (Andam et al. 2008, 2010, Joppa and Pfaff 2009).”