A Battle of Taste and Environmental Convictions for Ecolabeled Seafood: A Contingent Ranking Experiment

147 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Economic Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility (2012, background): “Consumers express additional values for local, organic, free trade, and eco-labeled foods including wine, potatoes, and seafood (Louriero and Hine 2000, Louriero 2003, Johnston and Roheim 2006).”
CONSUMERS' WILLINGNESS TO PAY FOR AQUACULTURE FISH PRODUCTS VS. WILD-CAUGHT SEAFOOD – A CASE STUDY IN HAWAII (2012, background): “Furthermore, focus groups and taste panels have investigated sensory properties for seafood preferences (Drake et al, 2006 ; Johnston & Roheim, 2006 ).”
Valuing biodiversity enhancement in New Zealand's planted forests: Socioeconomic and spatial determinants of willingness-to-pay (2014, background): “However, low survey response rates were also experienced in other surveys such as Johnston and Roheim (2006)with 31% and Wordsworth et al. (2006) with 32%, and Chen et al. (2010) with 29%.”
Willingness to Pay for Multiple Seafood Labels in a Niche Market (2014, methodology): “A contingent ranking analysis by Johnston and Roheim (2006) evaluated tradeoffs between ecolabels and species.”