Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections.

By M. Ryan, K. Gerard. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 2003

696 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60d9f869d7919803f3a5a5478129136f58e6f2f9

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Sample Size Requirements for Discrete-Choice Experiments in Healthcare: a Practical Guide (2015, background): “Older literature was ignored, as the research frontier for methodological issues has shifted a lot over the past years [1, 22].”
How to support the application of multiple criteria decision analysis? Let us start with a comprehensive taxonomy (2020, background): “, concerning pairwise comparisons or assignment examples) with up to six criteria are usually deemed feasible for DMs to answer [150,34].”
Constructing experimental designs for discrete-choice experiments: report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Experimental Design Good Research Practices Task Force. (2013, background): “are directed to several systematic reviews of conjoint-analysis applications in health care [5–13] and several methodological reviews [6,14–18].”
Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future (2018, methodology): “Information about the different econometric analysis methods and the appropriateness of these methods for different DCE applications is described in great detail in the prior reviews [6, 7, 11].”
Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force. (2016, background): “[3] Ryan M, Gerard K.”
Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017, background): “…2003; Kanninen 2006; Ryan, Gerard, andAmayaAmaya 2008), along with articles summarizing SP methods in different areas of economics (e.g., Boxall et al. 1996;Carson2000;Hanley,Mourato, andWright 2001; Ryan and Gerard 2003; Carson and Hanemann 2005; Hoyos 2010; de Bekker-Grob, Ryan, and Gerard 2012).”
Conducting Discrete Choice Experiments to Inform Healthcare Decision Making (2012, background): “A key advantage of grown rapidly (see Ryan and Gerard[13] and Ryan et measuring outcomes using QALYs is their generic al.”
A comparison of approaches to estimating confidence intervals for willingness to pay measures. (2007, background): “For a recent review of studies applying DCEs in health care see [2].”
Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis for Health Care Decision Making--An Introduction: Report 1 of the ISPOR MCDA Emerging Good Practices Task Force. (2016, methodology): “In contrast, decompositional methods—including DCEs or conjoint analysis [57–59] and Potentially All Pairwise RanKings of all possible Alternatives (PAPRIKA) [60]—involve participants ranking two or more real or hypothetical alternatives defined on some or all of the criteria.”
Conjoint analysis applications in health--a checklist: a report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force. (2011, unknown): “[7] Ryan M, Gerard K.”