Towards a functional neuroanatomy of speech perception.

By Gregory Hickok, David Poeppel. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2000

1,101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental Biology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/6042669265c201041c7523a21c00a2ab3360f6d1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental Biology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

The Perception-for-Action-Control Theory (PACT): A perceptuo-motor theory of speech perception. (2012, background): “For Hickok and Poeppel (2000, 2004, 2007) it is the network involved in learning the control and processing of phonemic units for speech communication and is thought to be used strategically to assist in working memory and sub-lexical tasks.”
Specific language impairment is not specific to language: the procedural deficit hypothesis. (2005, positive): “Working memory appears to involve the dorsal stream system (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000), and seems to be functionally related both to the retrieval of declarative knowledge and to procedural memory itself (for further discussion, see Ullman, 2004).”
Neural specializations for speech and pitch: moving beyond the dichotomies (2008, background): “Indeed, these details remain to be specified in any clear way, especially in terms of which pathways in the auditory processing stream are being engaged in the various studies (Hickok & Poeppel 2000; Scott & Johnsrude 2003).”
Structure and function of auditory cortex: music and speech. (2002, background): “Current evidence suggests that there are functional hierarchies, such that early stages of processing depend on core areas bilaterally, with ‘higher’ word-recognition mechanisms being associated with more anterior and ventral auditory regions in the left hemisphere [20, 21 ].”
The analysis of speech in different temporal integration windows: cerebral lateralization as 'asymmetric sampling in time' (2003, background): “…recent hemodynamic, electrophysiological, and neuropsychological data has the following properties: (1) The primary cortical substrate in which sound-based representations of speech are constructed is the bilateral superior temporal cortex (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000; Hickok and Poeppel, in press).”
Prelexical and lexical processing in listening (2004, neutral): “Auditory language comprehension deficits in Wernicke’s aphasia do not seem to be strongly related to phonological deficits (Blumstein, 1995; Hickok and Poeppel, 2000).”
Language, music, syntax and the brain (2003, background): “, the cortical representation of speech versus musical sound”
Sensorimotor Integration in Speech Processing: Computational Basis and Neural Organization (2011, neutral): “The dual stream model (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004, 2007) holds that early stages of speech processing occurs bilaterally in auditory regions on the dorsal STG (spectrotemporal analysis; green) and STS (phonological access/representation; yellow) and then diverges into two broad streams: a…”
Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. (2004, methodology): “In the following sections we outline the evidence relevant to our proposal, focusing on data that have not received extensive treatment in our initial description of the framework (Hickok & Poeppel, 2000).”
Auditory–Motor Interaction Revealed by fMRI: Speech, Music, and Working Memory in Area Spt (2003, background): “…component (the ‘‘phonological store’’), we have suggested instead that it reflects an auditory–motor interface system which translates between auditory representations of speech in the superior temporal lobe and motor representations of speech in the frontal lobe (Hickok & Poeppel, 2000).”
The Search for the Phonological Store: From Loop to Convolution (2008, background): “…of speech with articulatory counterparts stored in the frontal cortex (Jacquemot, 2006; Buchsbaum, Chang, et al., 2005; Buchsbaum, Olsen, Koch, & Berman, 2005; Buchsbaum, Olsen, Koch, Kohn, et al., 2005; Hickok & Poeppel, 2000, 2004; Nadeau, 2001; Wilson, 2001; Baddeley & Logie, 1992).”
The role of mirror neurons in speech perception and action word semantics (2010, background): “An alternative to the mirror neuron/motor theory of speech perception is a sensory theory of speech production (Guenther, Hampson, & Johnson, 1998 ; Hickok & Poeppel, 2000 , 2004 , 2007 ).”
The neural mechanisms of speech comprehension: fMRI studies of semantic ambiguity. (2005, background): “…temporal lobe may be recruited for higher levels of processing (Binder et al., 2000; Davis and Johnsrude, 2003; Scott and Johnsrude, 2003), and that the pathway that extends posteriorly and inferiorly plays a critical role in meaning-based comprehension processes (Hickok and Poeppel, 2000, 2004).”