The corporeality of practice-based learning

By Ali Yakhlef. 2010

151 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cultural Studies, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60141ff2c70d0059debba34c3054ad249ea2b4a7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cultural Studies

1. L. Tomkins
2. E. Ulus
3. Silvia Gherardi
4. Funmilola Olubunmi Omotayo

In Human Factors and Ergonomics

1. L. Tomkins
2. E. Ulus
3. Silvia Gherardi
4. Funmilola Olubunmi Omotayo

In Sociology and Political Science

1. L. Tomkins
2. E. Ulus
3. Silvia Gherardi
4. Funmilola Olubunmi Omotayo

Citations in the corpus

• Theorizing affective ethnography for organization studies (2018, background): “Although the body, the gendered body, and embodied knowing are very relevant for practicebased studies (Yakhlef, 2010), the turn to affect problematizes ‘what counts as a body’, noting that the word ‘body’ refers not only to human, individual bodies but also to any other living and nonliving ones.”
• Knowledge Management as an important tool in Organisational Management: A Review of Literature (2015, background): “He defines embodied knowledge as knowledge that is gained through training of the body to perform a task, and Hislop (2013); Strati (2007); Yakhlef (2010) point out that it is impossible to totally disembody this knowledge from people.”
• ‘Oh, was that “experiential learning”?!’ Spaces, synergies and surprises with Kolb’s learning cycle (2016, background): “…experience’ in a range of disciplines, including management studies (Cunliffe and Coupland, 2011; Sanders, 1982), management education (Strati, 2007; Yakhlef, 2010), phenomenological psychology (Langdridge, 2007; Smith et al., 2009), positive psychology (Csikszentmihalyi, 1990; Rathunde, 2001)…”