Who Can You Turn To? Tie Activation within Core Business Discussion Networks

By L. Renzulli, Howard E. Aldrich. 2005

124 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5f150bd2053faf423290ead6a9d7fec163354399

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

1. Alistair R. Anderson
2. Sarah L. Jack
3. Mabel Abraham
4. D. Goss
5. S. Müller
6. Friederike Welter
7. S. Korsgaard
8. Maria Minniti

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Sarah L. Jack
2. Alistair R. Anderson
3. S. Dodd
4. Mabel Abraham
5. Friederike Welter
6. S. Korsgaard
7. Ana María Peredo
8. James J. Chrisman

Citations in the corpus

• Kinship in Entrepreneur Networks: Performance Effects of Resource Assembly in Africa (2014, unknown): “Previous entrepreneurship studies (Kotha & George, 2012; Renzulli & Aldrich, 2005; Renzulli et al., 2000) have also found positive relationships between network size and resources accessibility and acquisition.”
• Change and the development of entrepreneurial networks over time: a processual perspective (2008, background): “2001 , Barnir and Smith 2002 , Lechner and Dowling 2003 , Rodan and Galunic 2004 , Renzulli and Aldrich 2005 , Parkhe et al .”
• Gender-role Incongruity and Audience-based Gender Bias: An Examination of Networking among Entrepreneurs (2020, background): “More generally, network scholars have long argued that specifying individual-level differences in how actors use social ties provides an opportunity to make theoretical progress (Ibarra, Kilduff, and Tsai, 2005; Renzulli and Aldrich, 2005).”