The psychology of human-computer interaction

By Stuart Card, T. Moran, Allen Newell. 1983

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Human-Computer Interaction

Citations in the corpus

Imitating Interactive Intelligence (2020, background): “Progress towards this goal could greatly expand the scope and naturalness of human-computer interaction (Winograd, 1972; Card et al., 1983; Branwen, 2018) to the point that interacting with a computer or a robot would be much like interacting with another human being – through shared attention,…”
A Survey of Available Corpora For Building Data-Driven Dialogue Systems: The Journal Version (2015, background): “Similarly, dialogues involving visual and other modalities differ from dialogues without these modalities (Card et al., 1983; Goodwin, 1981).”
TURF: Toward a unified framework of EHR usability (2011, methodology): “Our definition of task analysis is based on the GOMS approach to task analysis [63,64].”
Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. (2001, unknown): “J. R. Anderson, 1983, 1993; Card, Moran, & Newell, 1983; Newell, 1990).”
Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life (2007, background): “The first is an assumption about human beings as information processors [11].”
Understanding and Resolving Failures in Human-Robot Interaction: Literature Review and Model Development (2018, background): “There are many theories regarding how people process information (e.g., McClelland, 1979; Card et al., 1983, 1986; Miller, 1988; Kieras and Meyer, 1997).”
Cognition and Behavior in Normal-Form Games: An Experimental Study (2000, unknown): “Following C&J, the noise could be reduced by filtering out look-ups shorter than subjects' minimum perception time of approximately 0.18 seconds ( Card, Moran, and Newell (1983) ).”
The Three Paradigms of HCI (2007, background): “ell [5], oriented around the idea that human information processing is deeply analogous to computational signal processing, and that the primary computerhuman interaction task is enabling communication between the machine and the person.”
On the need for attention-aware systems: Measuring effects of interruption on task performance, error rate, and affective state (2006, methodology): “By leveraging task modeling techniques such as GOMS (Card et al., 1983) or event perception theory (Zacks et al.”
Toward Meta-cognitive Tutoring: A Model of Help Seeking with a Cognitive Tutor (2006, methodology): “We used the Card, Moran, and Newell (1983) reading research as a baseline and then assumed that high skill students would need 1/3 of the time to read a hint as a mid or low level student would need.”
An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures (2000, background): “It might be fruitful to construct a GOMS model[ CMN83 ] simply to account for the number of physical and mental operators needed to implement each strategy and to see if such a model successfully predicts performance (time to complete a task).”
Mental Models: Theory and Application in Human Factors (1989, methodology): “Several notations have been employed to describe this mapping, such as grammars (e.g., Moran, 1981; Payne and Green, 1986; Reisner, 1984), production rules (Kieras and Polson, 1985), and stacks (Card, Moran, and Newell, 1983).”
Designing for Flexible Interaction Between Humans and Automation: Delegation Interfaces for Supervisory Control (2007, background): “…(a) ﬁner-grained functional decompositions such as operator functional modeling (Mitchell,1987),Goals-Operations-Methods-Scripts (GOMS) models (Card, Moran, & Newell, 1983), and Plan-Goal Graphs (Geddes, 1989) that stress the subfunctions causally required to achieve a parent, and/or (b)…”