Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.
By C. Elston, I. Ellis. Histopathology, 2002
1,200 citations recorded by the source corpus.
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e45dfc8104c180d1b9aeff0e0f3e9c580a97b54
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
- Alexey A. Shvets
- Vladimir I. Iglovikov
- Alexander Rakhlin
- Alexandr A Kalinin
- A. Giuliano
- H. Rugo
- E. Mittendorf
- D. Weaver
Citations in the corpus
- A Living Biobank of Breast Cancer Organoids Captures Disease Heterogeneity. (2018, unknown): “For decades, BC has been classified into meaningful subgroups based on histological features (Azzopardi et al., 1979; Ellis et al., 1992; Elston and Ellis, 1991; Lakhani, 2012).”
- Methods for Nuclei Detection, Segmentation, and Classification in Digital Histopathology: A Review—Current Status and Future Potential (2014, unknown): “Similarly, nuclei pleomorphism has diagnostic value for cancer grading [34]–[36].”
- Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Breast Cancer Histology Image Analysis (2018, background): “Histopathology aims to distinguish between normal tissue, non-malignant (benign) and malignant lesions (carcinomas) and to perform a prognostic evaluation [2].”
- IL-6 triggers malignant features in mammospheres from human ductal breast carcinoma and normal mammary gland. (2007, unknown): “following the classification described by Elston and Ellis (59).”
- BreCaHAD: a dataset for breast cancer histopathological annotation and diagnosis (2019, methodology): “Nottingham grading system (also called the Elston-Ellis [1] modification of Scarff-Bloom-Richardson [2] grading system) is widely used criteria for the grade of breast tissues based on three main fea - tures, namely nuclear pleomorphism, tubular formation, and mitotic count, each of which is given…”
- Expert Commentary. (2002, unknown): “The focal paper of this modernization appeared in Histopathology.3 The necessary recitation of criteria with clinical verification are here providing a citation for what has become known more widely as the Nottingham system of histologic grading of breast cancer.”
- Breast Cancer—Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual (2017, methodology): “Today, the evaluation of these 3 factors has been standardized by the Nottingham group.(10,11) Each of the 3 factors—nuclear pleomorphism, gland or tubule TABLE 4.”
- Regression Concept Vectors for Bidirectional Explanations in Histopathology (2018, methodology): “For this reason, we referred to the Nottingham Histologic Grading system (NHG) [2] to select nuclear pleomorphism, and especially variations in nuclei size, shape and texture as concept measures.”
- A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. (2002, unknown): “63 No 157 (87) 98 (85) Yes 23 (13) 17 (15)”