The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature
By J. Valderas, A. Kotzeva, M. Espallargues, G. Guyatt, C. Ferrans, M. Halyard, Dennis A. Revicki, T. Symonds, A. Parada, Jordi Alonso. Quality of Life Research, 2008
759 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Oncology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5e45ca0b0eae7f42aa1065e26656d3c9afcb4e71
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Oncology
In Sociology and Political Science
Citations in the corpus
- Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations (2012, background): “Research has shown that integration of PROs in clinical practice improves patient– clinician communication and in some cases, enhances patient care and outcomes [2–4].”
- The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why? (2009, methodology): “[1] identified 14 trials that assessed the impact of feeding back PROs to clinicians on the detection of problems.”
- A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting (2013, methodology): “Four cancer trials were cited in a previous review (Valderas et al. 2008) [27].”
- Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2016, neutral): “Age, median (range), years 61 (30-91) 62 (26-88) 59 (30-85) 60 (26-88) 67 (38-91) 67 (44-86) Female sex 257 (58) 187 (58) 184 (64) 152 (60) 73 (47) 35 (49) Race White 377 (86) 283 (87) 253 (89) 230 (91) 124 (80) 53 (74) Black† 43 (10) 24 (7) 20 (7) 10 (4) 23 (15) 14 (19) Asian 21 (5) 18 (6) 13 (5) 1”