Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations
By C. Snyder, N. Aaronson, A. Choucair, T. E. Elliott, Joanne Greenhalgh, M. Halyard, R. Hess, Deborah M. Miller, B. Reeve, M. Santana. Quality of Life Research, 2012
790 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Oncology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/0be3474cf498b1e73802e6b354ccf603cc4ec4d2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Oncology
Citations in the corpus
- ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research (2013, methodology): “In addition, ISOQOL recently completed two guidance documents relevant for this landscape review on the use of PRO measures in comparative effectiveness research and on integrating PRO measures in healthcare delivery settings [5, 39].”
- Symptom Monitoring With Patient-Reported Outcomes During Routine Cancer Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial. (2016, neutral): “Age, median (range), years 61 (30-91) 62 (26-88) 59 (30-85) 60 (26-88) 67 (38-91) 67 (44-86) Female sex 257 (58) 187 (58) 184 (64) 152 (60) 73 (47) 35 (49) Race White 377 (86) 283 (87) 253 (89) 230 (91) 124 (80) 53 (74) Black† 43 (10) 24 (7) 20 (7) 10 (4) 23 (15) 14 (19) Asian 21 (5) 18 (6) 13 (5) 1”