Fit of Different Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Experiments

By Irmgard W. Corten, Willem E. Saris, Germà Coenders, W. M. van der Veld, C. Aalberts, Charles Kornelis. 2002

53 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Sensitivity of Fit Indexes to Misspecified Structural or Measurement Model Components: Rationale of Two-Index Strategy Revisited (2005, methodology): “The two-index strategy and the proposed cutoff criteria for fit indexes in model fit assessment have been gaining popularity in SEM applications (e.g., Corten et al., 2002; DiStefano, 2002; Glaser, 2001, 2002; Moulder & Algina, 2002; Pomplun & Omar, 2001).”
Comparing questions with agree/ disagree response options to questions with item-specific response options (2010, result): “Corten et al. (2002) showed, analyzing many data sets, that the additive model compared several alternative explanations for method specific correlations and concluded that the MTMM model of Saris and Andrews gave the best explanation .”
8. A New Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Measurement Instruments: The Split-Ballot MTMM Design (2004, methodology): “Using the latter specification, combined with the assumptions in (4b) and (4c), hardly any problems occur in practice (see Corten et al. [2002] , who reanalyzed 79 MTMM experiments).”
Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales (2014, result): “Corten et al. (2002) and Saris and Aalbers (2003) compared different models and concluded that the model discussed by Alwin (1974) and the equivalent model of Saris and Andrews (1991) fit best to several data sets.”