8. A New Approach to Evaluating the Quality of Measurement Instruments: The Split-Ballot MTMM Design

105 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Research into Questionnaire Design: A Summary of the Literature (2010, result): “This higher quality of Il-point scales, preferably with labelled fixed reference points, confirms the results of a meta-analysis conducted by Saris et al. (2004), and has also been found to hold for cross-national studies (Fitzgerald & Widdop 2004).”
Measuring Left–Right Political Orientation: The Choice of Response Format (2007, methodology): “For the estimation of measurement error, Saris et al. (2004) suggest a design that combines two of the classic approaches: an experimental design and statistical modeling.”
Assessing response styles across modes of data collection (2008, background): “Second, respondents need to be asked about the same trait three times, which may lead to memory effects and inflated internal consistency of the trait factors (Saris et al. 2004).”
Choosing the Number of Categories in Agree–Disagree Scales (2014, background): “This reduces the number of repetitions: each respondent answers only two versions of the question instead of three (Saris et al. 2004).”