Politicians, the Media, and Domestic Audience Costs
By Branislav L. Slantchev. 2006
173 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5da299e6e5f47bbf3d013317e808ad4dc05606ca
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
In Sociology and Political Science
In Strategy and Management
Citations in the corpus
- Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve (2008, background): “…Hart 1996; Partell and Palmer 1999; Gelpi and Griesdorf 2001; and Prins 2003+ Schultz 1999 also presents evidence consistent with that hypothesis+ Slantchev 2006, in contrast, argues that audience costs are higher in democracies only when press freedom is strongly protected+ International…”
- The Relationships Between Mass Media, Public Opinion, and Foreign Policy: Toward a Theoretical Synthesis (2008, background): “Slantchev (2006) shows why the everpresent and implicit threat of public back- lash might consistently, rather than sporadically, influence the behavior of leaders via anticipation of public reactions.”
- Authoritarian Signaling, Mass Audiences, and Nationalist Protest in China (2013, background): “…By nipping protests in the bud, autocrats convey their willingness to 25+ See Smith 1998; Schultz 1999; Guisinger and Smith 2002; Sartori 2002; Slantchev 2006; Snyder and Borghard 2011; Downes and Sechser 2012; and Debs and Weiss 2012+ 26+ Although autocrats may justify concessions…”
- Domestic Audience Costs in International Relations: An Experimental Approach (2007, background): “…with characteristics of the situation or the audience+ If, on the other hand, citizens showed no stronger preference for leaders who avoided commitments than for leaders who committed and subsequently reneged, one would need to rethink how leaders send signals and make commitments in world affairs+”