Autocratic Audience Costs: Regime Type and Signaling Resolve

By Jessica L. P. Weeks. International Organization, 2008

684 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The Behavioral Revolution and International Relations (2017, neutral): “Fearon 1994; Tomz 2007; Weeks 2008.”
Democracy and armed conflict (2014, background): “Weeks (2008) builds on this argument by showing that single-party regimes also indicate behavior in line with a signaling argument.”
Do Democracies Make Inferior Counterinsurgents? Reassessing Democracy's Impact on War Outcomes and Duration (2010, background): “…example, Przeworski and Limongi 1997, 177–79; Collier and Levitsky 1997, 430–51; and Munck and Verkuilen 2002+ 43+ See Marshall and Jaggers 2006; Geddes 2003; Weeks 2008; and Freedom House 2008+ 44+ For examples, see Lake 1992; Russett and Oneal 2001; Gleditsch and Ward 2006; Downes 2007;…”
Generals, Dictators, and Kings (2010, background): “…regimes are significant determinants of cross-country variation in regime failure (Geddes, 1999b, 2003), the risk of inter-state war (Peceny et al., 2002; Lai and Slater, 2006), target reciprocation in militarized disputes (Weeks, 2008), and differences in economic outcomes (Wright, 2008).”
Democracy and dictatorship revisited (2010, background): “…regimes account for variance in their economic growth and investment (Wright 2008), conﬂict behavior (Peceny et al. 2002; Lai and Slater 2006; Weeks 2008), political survival (Geddes 1999), prospects for democratization (Linz and Stepan 1996; Bratton and van de Walle 1997; Hadenius and…”