TOWARDS RELIABLE BIRD SURVEYS: ACCOUNTING FOR INDIVIDUALS PRESENT BUT NOT DETECTED

By W. Thompson. 2002

421 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5d57ee16a3fb54063bb331ad57f67f6f85b0728b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

Citations in the corpus

EXPERIMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE AUDITORY DETECTION PROCESS ON AVIAN POINT COUNTS (2007, background): “Most of the disparity concerns the importance of estimating detection probabilities associated with individual counts (Anderson 2002, Thompson 2002, Hutto and Young 2002, Bart et al. 2004).”
How you count counts: the importance of methods research in applied ecology (2008, methodology): “Imperfect detection has received particular attention, and various methods have been introduced to help researchers estimate what portion of the target population is detected so that appropriate adjustments can be made (Thompson 2002; Simons et al . 2007). One common method, distance sampling, allow”
Distribution of specialist and generalist species along spatial gradients of habitat disturbance and fragmentation (2008, background): “That species are not equally detected was previously emphasized (Boulinier et al. 1998) as well as the fact that detectability can vary across habitats (Thompson 2002).”
IMPROVING ESTIMATES OF BIRD DENSITY USING MULTIPLE- COVARIATE DISTANCE SAMPLING (2007, background): “It is widely recognized that adjusting for detectability provides the basis for stronger inferences by removing the need to rely on untestable and unrealistic assumptions of constant detectability (e.g., Rosenstock et al. 2002, Thompson 2002, Diefenbach et al. 2003).”
TIME-OF-DETECTION METHOD FOR ESTIMATING ABUNDANCE FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS (2007, background): “Estimating detection probabilities is essential for obtaining reliable estimates of population abundance (Nichols et al. 2000, Farnsworth et al. 2002, Thompson 2002).”
Inferences About Landbird Abundance from Count Data: Recent Advances and Future Directions (2009, methodology): “Debate about approaches for drawing inferences about population size and dynamics from avian count data has motivated symposia and workshops over the years (Ralph and Scott 1981; Ralph et al. 1995) and has persisted through the present time (e.g., Anderson 2001; Hutto and Young 2002, 2003; Rosenstoc”
ESTIMATING DETECTION PROBABILITY AND DENSITY FROM POINT-COUNT SURVEYS: A COMBINATION OF DISTANCE AND DOUBLE-OBSERVER SAMPLING (2006, background): “The shortcomings of unadjusted point counts have long been recognized (Barker and Sauer 1995, Rosenstock et al. 2002, Thompson 2002, Diefenbach et al. 2003, Norvell et al. 2003, Farnsworth et al. 2005, and others), and our results further substantiate recommendations to abandon their use for…”
The remote environmental assessment laboratory's acoustic library: An archive for studying soundscape ecology (2012, background): “Traditionally, one of the most commonly used survey methods for identifying bird species and estimating abundance has been the point count survey (Ralph et al., 1995; Rosenstock et al., 2002; Thompson, 2002).”
The 'standardized search': An improved way to conduct bird surveys (2003, methodology): “Several new methods or modifications to existing methods have recently been proposed (Mac Nally & Horrocks 2002; Thompson 2002 ), but many are not applicable to communitybased richness estimates (Tarvin et al . 1998; Anthony et al . 1999) or apply solely to territorial species (Nichols et al . 2000”
ENHANCING THE SCIENTIFIC VALUE OF THE CHRISTMAS BIRD COUNT (2005, background): “…limitations Downloaded From: https://bioone.org/journals/The-Auk on 04 Mar 2020 Terms of Use: https://bioone.org/terms-of-use as all index counts (Thompson 2002), but would provide a more realistic picture of population change within individual CBC circles—a primary interest of many CBC…”