ENHANCING THE SCIENTIFIC VALUE OF THE CHRISTMAS BIRD COUNT

By E. Dunn, Charles M. Francis, P. Blancher, S. R. Drennan, M. A. Howe, D. Lepage, C. S. Robbins, K. Rosenberg, John R. Sauer, Kimberly G. Smith. 2005

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7c62bd466f9eb1a1631ce7f5eafaa8d4169965bc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. W. J. Sutherland
2. A. Johnston
3. Tatsuya Amano
4. Colin M. Beale
5. Anthony David Fox
6. O. Komar

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. W. J. Sutherland
2. A. Johnston
3. Anthony David Fox
4. Mark J. Whittingham
5. Colin M. Beale

Citations in the corpus

• When can we trust population trends? A method for quantifying the effects of sampling interval and duration (2019, methodology): “We obtained an initial dataset of yearly count data for 174 waterbird species in North America from the Christmas Bird Count (CBC; Dunn et al. , 2005) at 1,123 sites spanning the years 1966 to 2013 (Amano et al. , 2018), from which 30 years of consecutive counts were taken for each site by species…”