Inferences About Landbird Abundance from Count Data: Recent Advances and Future Directions

221 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The first 50 years of the North American Breeding Bird Survey (2017, methodology): “…counts such as those collected by the BBS have been shown to be subject to a variety of environmental factors that influence detection of birds (Nichols et al. 2009), and the analysis of a survey that ‘‘encounters an unknown proportion of birds in an undefined area’’ (Link and Sauer 1998a) has…”
Imperfect detection and its consequences for monitoring for conservation (2008, background): “In addition, it has perhaps not been sufficiently widely recognized that detection consists of several components (Pollock et al. 2004, Nichols et al. 2008).”
Persistence of Environmental DNA in Freshwater Ecosystems (2011, background): “However, any detection in the field is always imperfect and sampling is a stochastic process [11].”