Who Cares about the Environmental Impact of Cars?

By J. Joireman, P. V. van Lange, M. van Vugt. 2004

304 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Transportation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5cb1d1fce8cb68e197405d42cfc06a120bdaa023

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Applied Psychology

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

In Transportation

Citations in the corpus

Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being (2011, background): “The links between NR, personal growth, and having a sense of purpose in life also suggest that NR people may act more environmentally because they are more apt to engage in long-term thinking (e.g., Joireman et al. 2004 ).”
Consideration of Future Consequences as a Predictor of Environmentally Responsible Behavior (2015, background): “Some of the studies mentioned so far suggest that the influence of CFC on behavior may be more complex than a simple direct relationship (for an elaboration see Joireman, Strathman, & Balliet, 2006); either it may moderate the impact of other variables such as environmental concern (Kortenkamp & Moo”
Environmental psychology matters. (2014, background): “…tendency to establish and achieve goals and to plan strategies for meeting long-term obligations—was positively related to engaging in sustainable behaviors (Corral-Verdugo & Pinheiro 2006, Milfont & Gouveia 2006), including choosing public transport more often ( Joireman et al. 2004).”
Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention (2012, background): “Joireman, Van Lange, and Van Vugt ( 2004 ) argue that the consideration of future consequences of using a product can have a significant effect on the choice between travel modes.”
Intentions to make sustainable tourism choices: do value orientations, time perspective, and efficacy beliefs explain individual differences?† (2017, background): “…strong CFC (compared to people with weak CFC) are more likely to recycle their waste (Lindsay & Strathman, 1997), commute via public transportation (Joireman et al., 2004), engage in pro-environmental political behaviour (Joireman et al., 2001), or hold positive attitudes towards environmental…”
The psychology of social dilemmas: A review. (2013, unknown): “, Joireman, 2005; Kortenkamp & Moore, 2006), and commuting decisions (Joireman et al., 2004; Van Vugt et al., 1995).”
Time Perspective and Sustainable Behavior (2014, background): “In the context of environmental issues, a number of studies have shown that the CFC Scale is positively correlated with proenvironmental attitudes and behaviors (e.g., Collins & Chambers, 2005; Joireman et al., 2001; Joireman et al., 2004), such that higher CFC scores are associated with greater pro”
Sustainable behavior and time perspective: present, past, and future orientations and their relationship with water conservation behavior (2006, background): “A more recent study by Joreiman, et al. (2004) indicated that higher scores in CFC correlated with preference for commuting to work by public transportation (instead of by car).”
Time perspective and values: An exploratory study of their relations to environmental attitudes (2006, background): “, 1995) to the understanding and prediction of EAs, but not many have looked at the overlap between TP and values (but see Joireman et al., 2001; Joireman et al., 2004).”
Senior managers' perception on green information systems (IS) adoption and environmental performance: Results from a field survey (2013, background): “[14] examined the relationship between preference for commuting to work by car or public transportation too depends on the commuter’s CFC and found individuals high in CFC preferred commuting by public transportation.”
How can we promote behaviour that serves all of us in the future (2008, background): “Frequently, these differences are magnified when the long-term consequences of a behavioral option are more salient, for example, when people believe that commuting by car leads to longterm environmental problems (Joireman et al., 2004), or when aggression is likely to carry future negative conseque”