Mergers and acquisitions through an intellectual capital perspective

By O. Gupta, Goran Roos. 2001

126 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The knowledge-based view of the firm and its theoretical precursor (2006, background): “Resources can also be tangible, or intangible (Bontis, 1998; Hoskisson et al., 1999; Hannes and Fjeldstad, 2000; Gupta and Roos, 2001; Spanos and Lioukas, 2001; Mathews, 2003).”
Outward FDI and Knowledge Flows: A Study of the Indian Automotive Sector (2008, unknown): “Following the resource based view of the firm (Barney, 1991) it can be suggested that the developing region firms seeking theses capabilities are more likely to engage in merger and acquisitions (M&As) as a strategy to quickly expand their knowledge base to meet growing competition (Gupta and Roos, ”
Why do firms measure their intellectual capital (2003, background): “Empirical evidence can be found in Gupta and Roos (2001) who use a case study approach to demonstrate how the measurement of intellectual capital can aid organization’s mergers and acquisitions strategy.”
Strategic Management of Intangible Assets and Value Drivers in R&D Organizations (2005, unknown): “This seems to further the usefulness of the initial technique (Gupta and Roos, 2001; Neely et al., 2003).”