Bivalve carrying capacity in coastal ecosystems

By R. Dame, T. Prins. Aquatic Ecology, 2004

263 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Oceanography

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ba9155c9641f2076c2cebc1c771c450cc6992c8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

1. J. Ferreira
2. Karin Troost
3. S. Bricker
4. Jon Grant
5. Wei-Der Jiang
6. J. Ruesink
7. S. Rumrill
8. A. Hawkins

In Oceanography

1. P. Cranford
2. Jon Grant
3. B. Hargrave
4. M. Archambault
5. P. Strain
6. A. Smaal
7. M. Gibbs
8. Wei-Der Jiang

Citations in the corpus

• Mathematical modelling to assess the carrying capacity for multi-species culture within coastal waters (2003, background): “One of the simplest ways to assess potential effects of bivalve culture at the ecosystem scale is by comparing the time scales of water renewal, phytoplankton doubling and particle clearance by bivalves, thereby estimating the time it takes for a particular standing stock of bivalves to filter all w”
• Site selection for shellfish aquaculture by means of GIS and farm-scale models, with an emphasis on data-poor environments (2011, background): “, 2006), while slack water and strong currents or wave action have detrimental effects (Dame and Prins, 1998).”
• Predicting the carrying capacity of bivalve shellfish culture using a steady, linear food web model (2005, methodology): “Dame and Prins, 1997; Smaal et al., 1997; Bacher et al., 1998; Duarte et al., 2003).”
• An integrated ecosystem approach for assessing the potential role of cultivated bivalve shells as part of the carbon trading system (2015, background): “Bivalve filtration activity may exert a topdown control of phytoplankton populations (Dame 1996, Dame & Prins 1998, Escaravage & Prins 2002, Newell 2004, Prins & Escaravage 2005, Petersen et al. 2008), to the extent that phytoplankton depletion can compromise bivalve performance when cultured at…”
• Seasonal variation in metabolism of cultured Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, in Sanggou Bay, China (2006, background): “As more living biomass is accumulated, the proportion of primary production that is available for further growth in bivalve biomass declines (Dame and Prins, 1998), and factors such as increased biodeposition may contribute to significant environmental changes such as sediment anoxia (Suchanek, 1992”
• The ecological role of bivalve shellfish aquaculture in the estuarine environment: A review with application to oyster and clam culture in West Coast (USA) estuaries (2009, background): “Substantial work has been carried out worldwide on bivalve carrying capacity, especially via coupled biological–physical models (Dame and Prins,1998; Gangnery et al., 2001; Sara andMazzola, 2004; Duarte et al., 2005; McKindsey et al., 2006; Ferreira et al., 2007; Grant et al. 2008; Wang et al.,…”
• Influence of mussel aquaculture on nitrogen dynamics in a nutrient enriched coastal embayment (2007, background): “…molluscs exert a dominant influence on energy flow and nutrient cycling in many coastal marine ecosystems, particularly in inlets where water residence time is long and bivalve biomass is high (Smaal & Prins 1993, Dame 1996, Dame & Prins 1998, Cranford et al. 2003, Newell 2004, Grant et al. 2005).”
• Numerical analysis of the food web of an intertidal mudflat ecosystem on the Atlantic coast of France (2003, unknown): “The Brouage ecosystem, however, is microphytobenthos-dominated; this is consistent with a comparison between Marennes-Oléron Bay and 10 other coastal and estuarine ecosystems (Dame & Prins 1998).”
• Influence of stocking density on growth of mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) in suspended culture (2012, background): “The 63 quantity of food available at local scale depends on mussel population density, seston 64 availability and the hydrodynamic patterns (Dame and Prins, 1998).”
• Clearance rates of the great scallop (Pecten maximus) and blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) at low natural seston concentrations (2009, background): “For example, Norwegian fjords and coastal waters are considered as low seston environments when compared with sites where most studies on mussel feeding on natural seston have been carried out (Grant et al. 1997; Smaal et al. 1997; Pitcher and Calder 1998; Dame and Prins 1998; Cranford and Hill 19”
• Ecological drivers of the Ediacaran-Cambrian diversification of Metazoa (2012, unknown): “effect depends on such variables as the water residence time (turnover from outside the system), the rate of primary productivity and the clearance time (the time required for filter-feeders to filter the water of the ecosystem, which is in turn a function of the biomass of filter-feeders, particle ”
• Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: Case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries (2010, background): “Carrying capacity may be defined as a function of the water residence time, primary production time and bivalve clearance time (Dame and Prins, 1998).”
• Integrating ecological, economic and social aspects to generate useful management information under the EU Directives' ‘ecosystem approach’ (2012, background): “This development (governed by resource limitation or scarcity in space) is considered as an ecosystem property (Dame and Prins, 1997).”
• Marine diatoms sustain growth of bivalves in a Mediterranean lagoon (2012, background): “…about intense bivalve farming in small and confined areas such as the Thau lagoon is the risk of attaining the carrying capacity of the system, i.e., the maximum bivalve biomass that can be supported without affecting future productivity and integrity of the ecosystem (Dame and Prins, 1997).”