Numerical analysis of the food web of an intertidal mudflat ecosystem on the Atlantic coast of France

By D. Leguerrier, Nathalie Niquil, N. Boileau, Jadwiga Rzeznik, P. Sauriau, O. Moine, Cédric Bacher. 2003

98 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Cyclic energy pathways in ecological food webs (2007, background): “, 1998; Christian and Luczkovich, 1999; Opitz, 1996; Link, 2002) that include detritus in the data sets but with no input into that compartment (set E1), and 16 empirically derived food webs (Lindeman, 1942; Heymans et al., 2002; Sandberg et al., 2000; Dame and Patten, 1981; Patten, 1988; Leguerrier”
BIODIVERSITY LOSS AND ECOSYSTEM FUNCTIONING: DISTINGUISHING BETWEEN NUMBER AND IDENTITY OF SPECIES (2005, background): “On rocky shores, the majority of microalgae are consumed by grazers while the majority of the macroalgae form detritus that underpins many coastal food webs (Mann 1973, Miller and Mann 1973, Leguerrier et al. 2003).”
Exploitation of natural food sources by two sympatric, invasive suspension-feeders: Crassostrea gigas and Crepidula fornicata (2007, background): “…of Crassostrea gigas and Crepidula fornicata The food supply available to suspension-feeders in mudflat ecosystems such as Bourgneuf Bay is conven- 187 Mar Ecol Prog Ser 334: 179–192, 2007 tionally considered to be chiefly composed of benthic diatoms (Riera & Richard 1996, Leguerrier et al. 2003).”