Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science

By Richard Osbaldiston, J. P. Schott. 2012

603 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b8efe82d8120871be0f191a337b579e6bf12c3c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law

1. Wesley Schultz
2. S. van der Linden
3. Deborah Roy
4. Andreas Nilsson
5. Harm Alhusen
6. Ann-Kathrin Blankenberg
7. Magnus Bergquist
8. P. W. Schultz

In Marketing

1. Wesley Schultz
2. S. van der Linden
3. Andreas Nilsson
4. Harm Alhusen
5. Ann-Kathrin Blankenberg
6. Magnus Bergquist
7. Deborah Roy
8. Bas Verplanken

In Sociology and Political Science

1. S. van der Linden
2. Wesley Schultz
3. Deborah Roy
4. Ann-Kathrin Blankenberg
5. Harm Alhusen
6. Kyongji Han
7. Andreas Nilsson
8. Magnus Bergquist

Citations in the corpus

• Empowering interventions to promote sustainable lifestyles: Testing the habit discontinuity hypothesis in a field experiment (2016, methodology): “On the basis of a meta-analysis of 253 intervention studies in the domain of proenvironmental behaviours, Osbaldiston and Schott (2012) found that interventions that included cognitive dissonance, goal setting, social modelling and the use of prompts showed the largest effect sizes.”
• Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior (2014, methodology): “The classification of each tool, summarized in Figure 2, was based on a review of the studies included in the meta-analysis by Osbaldiston and Schott (2012). It provides an initial starting point for classifying behavior change tools, but should be viewed with caution.”