Strategies for Promoting Proenvironmental Behavior
By P. W. Schultz. 2014
303 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Applied Psychology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Marketing
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/7a249a1c6ad46cfd9fcf97bd46607d4dba00f3ff
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Applied Psychology
- J. Wharton
- A. Young
- Xiongzhi Wang
- Xiangru Qin
- Andreas Nilsson
- Magnus Bergquist
- Kathayoon Khalil
- Yongbo Zhou
In Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
- J. Wharton
- M. Kohlová
- A. Young
- Xiongzhi Wang
- Xiangru Qin
- Andreas Nilsson
- Magnus Bergquist
- Kathayoon Khalil
In Marketing
Citations in the corpus
- Green consumption does not make people cheat: Three attempts to replicate moral licensing effect due to pro-environmental behavior (2019, background): “Making people engage in pro-environmental behavior is arguably one of the general goals of environmental psychology (e.g., Schultz, 2014).”
- Spillover effects in environmental behaviors, across time and context: a review and research agenda (2017, background): “A wide range of different intervention tools, such as goal setting, social norms, and prompts, have had some success, but this success is based on a close matching between the specific barrier and the motivation of the target population (Mckenzie-Mohr and Schultz 2014).”
- Empathy for Animals: A Review of the Existing Literature (2018, background): “The most common barriers or incentives that impact proenvironmental behavior change no matter the internal motivation, are prompts, commitments, feedback, social norms, Ashley Young, Kathayoon A. Young, Jim Wharton 5 incentives, and convenience (Schultz 2014).”
- A route to school informational intervention for air pollution exposure reduction (2020, background): “Schultz [29] mentioned that for higher success and impacts interventions should be designed as such that they are focused on aspects of individual travel behavior which are comparatively easier to change and at the same time bring high benefits.”
- A comparative study of relative roles and sequences of cognitive and affective attitudes on tourists’ pro-environmental behavioral intention (2020, background): “However, this paper, in line with Schultz (2014), implies that persuading tourists, in the name of being good or beneficial for the environment, to act pro-environmentally can be invalid as these interventions may direct tourists to an instrumental evaluation of “costs” against their hedonic goals…”