Arts and the quality of life: an Exploratory study

By Alexandros Charles Michalos. 2005

101 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Conservation, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Social Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b86cf5efe4b3fe838c45c7e04f9c07c1b9e964b

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Conservation

1. C. Bickerton
2. M. Sirgy
3. D. Wheatley

In Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

1. C. Bickerton
2. M. Sirgy
3. D. Wheatley

In Social Psychology

1. C. Bickerton
2. M. Sirgy
3. D. Wheatley
4. Muzaffer Uysal
5. J. Nawijn
6. Hye-Lina Kim
7. Dong-Jin Lee
8. Eunju Woo

Citations in the corpus

• Theoretical Perspectives Guiding QOL Indicator Projects (2011, background): “Michalos (2005) conducted an indicators project that has focused exclusively on arts and its relationship to QOL (cf. Michalos and Kahlke 2008).”
• The Impact of Culture on the Individual Subjective Well-Being of the Italian Population: An Exploratory Study (2011, background): “Summarizing the multivariate results, it turned out that the arts have a very small impact on QOL, and could only explain from 5% to 11% of the variance in four plausible measures of the self-perceived quality of respondents’ lives (Michalos 2005).”
• Subjective well-being and engagement in arts, culture and sport (2017, background): “…paper. while frequency is important in determining the satisfaction obtained from certain arts activities (consistent with the DCMS findings), a more nuanced understanding is required: greater frequency does not always equate to greater satisfaction (Michalos and Kahlke 2010, 2008; Michalos 2005).”