Spatial differences in acquisition of soil phosphate between two arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in symbiosis with Medicago truncatula
By F. Andrew Smith, I. Jakobsen, Sarah E. Smith. 2000
300 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Pharmacology, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5b1a920f02f8df0a872f975c6455ceb3f330bad2
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Pharmacology
- F. Andrew Smith
- Matthias C. Rillig
- M. Hart
- Sarah E. Smith
- J. Jansa
- Tiina Roose
- Andrea Schnepf
- P. Schweiger
In Plant Science
- Matthias C. Rillig
- J. Jansa
- F. Andrew Smith
- G. Kernaghan
- Sarah E. Smith
- E. Frossard
- M. Hart
- I. Jakobsen
Citations in the corpus
- Plant pathogen protection by arbuscular mycorrhizas: a role for fungal diversity? (2010, background): “Studies unrelated to pathogen protection have shown wide variation in terms of AM fungal-mediated nutrient uptake among AM fungal species (Jakobsen et al. 1992; van der Heijden et al. 1998, 2003; Smith et al. 2000; van Aarle et al. 2002).”
- Roles of arbuscular mycorrhizas in plant nutrition and growth: new paradigms from cellular to ecosystem scales. (2011, background): “Mycelia produced by different fungi have quite varied characteristics, in terms of hyphal diameters (usually in the range of 2–20 μm), extent of growth away from the root, and ability to absorb nutrients at a distance [up to 25 cm (65)] and translocate them to the root (23, 63, 99, 127).”
- Networks of power and influence: the role of mycorrhizal mycelium in controlling plant communities and agroecosystem functioning (2004, background): “…clearly emerg- © 2004 NRC Canada ing functional differences between AM fungi in the extent and efficiency with which they forage for P from roots (Smith et al. 2000), and in part this may be explained by differences in the lengths and extension distances of AM hyphae (Schweiger and Jakobsen…”
- Differential host plant performance as a function of soil arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal communities: experimentally manipulating co-occurring Glomus species (2006, background): “How a particular AMF species affects plant performance has traditionally been evaluated by comparing plants inoculated with only that fungus to plants without mycorrhizae (Sanders and Fitter 1992; Smith et al. 2000).”
- Contrasting phosphate acquisition of mycorrhizal fungi with that of root hairs using the root hairless barley mutant (2005, background): “associations (Smith et al. 2000).”
- The Ecology of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (2013, background): “There is no clear positive relationship between soil mycelial biomass and the quantities of nutrient transferred to hosts (Smith et al., 2000), nor to other AM fungi functional attributes.”
- Sanctions, Cooperation, and the Stability of Plant-Rhizosphere Mutualisms (2008, background): “…1992), amount of lipids allocated to storage (van Aarle & Olsson 2003), the transfer of P to their host plants (Boddington & Dodd 1999), C transport capacities across symbiotic interfaces (Dickson et al. 1999), and colonization and hyphal-length allocation (Smith et al. 2000, Hart & Reader 2005).”
- High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. (2004, background): “Other studies ( Jakobsen et al ., 1992a; Smith et al ., 2000, 2004; Drew et al ., 2003) have discussed interspecific differences, but the Fig.”
- Mycorrhizal Fungi Can Dominate Phosphate Supply to Plants Irrespective of Growth Responses1 (2003, methodology): “The soil used and the general experimental procedures were as described previously, and the P level in the soil was growth limiting (Pearson and Jakobsen, 1993; Smith et al., 2000).”
- Arbuscular mycorrhiza and soil nitrogen cycling (2012, background): “Even in the instances of verified presence of a dense hyphosphere, AM colonization of soil could be biased toward “runner hyphae”, long, thin exploratory hyphae that form few to no branches (Friese and Allen, 1991; Smith et al., 2000).”
- Impact of growth and uptake patterns of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on plant phosphorus uptake—a modelling study (2008, background): “Smith et al. (2000) showed that a strain of S. calospora was less efficient to get 33P from outside a root compartment than G. caledonium, but both fungi were equally effective with regard to total P uptake.”
- Field inoculation effectiveness of native and exotic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi in a Mediterranean agricultural soil (2011, background): “A large functional intraspecific diversity was previously shown, confirming thatmycorrhizal benefits vary depending on the genetic diversity of AM fungal isolates (Jakobsen et al., 1992a; Smith et al., 2000; Streitwolf-Engel et al., 2001; van der Heijden and Sanders, 2002; Munkvold et al., 2004; Koc”
- Mycorrhizal mediation of plant N acquisition and residue decomposition: Impact of mineral N inputs (2006, background): “Different AM fungal species vary markedly in their root colonization and mycelium growth, leading to variation in their ability to supply plants with nutrients and promote plant growth (van der Heijden et al., 1998; Smith et al., 2000; van der Heijden et al., 2003).”
- Phosphorus acquisition and use: critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. (2003, background): “Although beyond the scope of this review, the most prevalent evolutionary adaptation by land plants (80% of all species) for acquiring P is through mycorrhizal symbioses (Koide & Kabir, 2000; Smith et al ., 2000; Burleigh et al ., 2002; Tibbett & Sanders, 2002).”