Conversation Analysis and the Professional Stocks of Interactional Knowledge

By A. Peräkylä, Sanna Vehvilƒinen. 2003

295 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Education, General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5af2843e16ee18ed6ad483513e166ac82acaec29

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Education

1. A. Peräkylä
2. S. Vehviläinen

In General Health Professions

1. A. Peräkylä
2. Johanna Ruusuvuori
3. Liisa Voutilainen
4. S. Vehviläinen

In Language and Linguistics

1. A. Peräkylä
2. Johanna Ruusuvuori
3. Liisa Voutilainen
4. E. Weiste
5. S. Vehviläinen
6. Melisa Stevanovic

Citations in the corpus

• A Comparative Conversation Analytic Study of Formulations in Psychoanalysis and Cognitive Psychotherapy (2013, background): “While it is reasonable to assume that the clinical theories of practitioners inform their interactions with clients (Peräkylä & Vehviläinen, 2003; Peräkylä, Ruusuvuori, & Vehviläinen, 2005), we do not know much about actual differences in interactional practices.”
• Problems in the Research Problem: Critical Feedback and Resistance in Academic Supervision (2009, background): “) It has been suggested that the CA results may have dialogues with the “member's theories,” such as professional theories (Perakyla & Vehvilainen, 2003 ).”
• Recognition and Interpretation: Responding to Emotional Experience in Psychotherapy (2010, background): “However, our results can be reflected upon in the context of this psychotherapeutic discussion (see Peräkylä & Vehviläinen, 2003).”