Another Look at Travel Patterns and Urban Form: The US and Great Britain

By Genevieve Giuliano, D. Narayan. 2003

248 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Network-Based Functional Regions (2011, background): “There is also a wealth of research on commuting patterns in large metropolitan areas of the US (Shen, 2000; Taylor and Ong, 1995), and Europe (eg, Giuliano and Narayan, 2003; Moss et al, 2004; Warnes, 1972) which focuses on variations in commute times and distances among population subgroups.”
The paradox of intensification (2011, result): “In the USA, where higher income groups generally prefer suburban living, there is a strong negative correlation between income and population density (Brownstone and Golob, 2009, Horning et al, 2008).”
An Empirical Analysis of Urban Form, Transport, and Global Warming (2008, background): “In disaggregate studies (e.g., Boarnet and Sarmiento, 1998, Crane and Crepeau, 1998, Giuliano and Narayan, 2003; Handy et al., 2005; Bento et al. 2005) the dependent variable (e.g., commuting) is measured at the individual level, whereas in aggregate studies (e.g., Newman and Kenworthy, 1989a and…”
Deconstructing development density: Quality, quantity and price effects on household non-work travel (2008, methodology): “use population density or net residential density in an ad hoc fashion, either to represent several hypothesized effects simultaneously or merely as a control variable without clear justification (e.g., Boarnet and Greenwald 2000; Frank et al. 2004; Giuliano and Narayan 2003; Naess 2006; Schimek 199”