What Impact? A Framework for Measuring the Scale and Scope of Social Performance
By Alnoor Ebrahim, V. Rangan. 2014
457 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Finance, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5ab61394357dda6b1e0d4a2ccf61537c61447108
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Finance
- Massimo Ciambotti
- I. Henriques
- F. Sgrò
- Nick Bontis
- Michael L. Barnett
- Bryan W. Husted
- Stephen Brammer
- Federica Palazzi
In Sociology and Political Science
- Massimo Ciambotti
- A. Crane
- I. Henriques
- F. Sgrò
- R. van Tulder
- Nick Bontis
- Michael L. Barnett
- Bryan W. Husted
Citations in the corpus
- Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships (2016, background): “There exists the danger of taking credit for results that the partners cannot achieve (Ebrahim and Rangan 2013).”
- Enhancing the Impact of Cross-Sector Partnerships (2015, background): “There exists the danger of taking credit for results that the partners cannot achieve (Ebrahim and Rangan 2013).”
- Beyond Good Intentions: Designing CSR Initiatives for Greater Social Impact (2020, methodology): “This model has been adapted to examine the social performance of nonprofit organizations, philanthropy, and social enterprises (Ebrahim & Rangan, 2014).”
- Social Entrepreneurship Research: Past Achievements and Future Promises (2018, unknown): “While this issue has been highlighted (e.g., Ebrahim & Rangan, 2014; Millar & Hall, 2013; Molecke & Pinkse, 2017) and various social impact assessment models have been compared (Grieco, Michelini, & Iasevoli, 2015), we still lack commonly accepted systematic measures of the social value construct…”
- Intellectual capital and financial performance in social cooperative enterprises (2018, methodology): “The mission-based performance can be measured through the social outcomes related to the development and enhancement of resources in terms of employees’ number, volunteers, satisfied users, provided services and others (Ebrahim and Rangan, 2014; Andreaus and Costa, 2014; Epstein and McFarlan, 2011).”