Semantic facilitation and semantic interference in language production: Further evidence for the conceptual selection model of lexical access

By Ineke Bloem, Sylvia A. A. Van Den Boogaard, W. Heij. 2004

146 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a67ca3e762b72512ac3c164d081b4b46867f7dc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

1. Judith F. Kroll
2. Susan C. Bobb
3. Z. Wodniecka
4. Albert Costa
5. E. Navarrete
6. Ellen Bialystok
7. David W. Green
8. K. Paap

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Judith F. Kroll
2. Susan C. Bobb
3. Z. Wodniecka
4. E. Navarrete
5. Albert Costa
6. Ellen Bialystok
7. David W. Green
8. K. Paap

Citations in the corpus

• Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech (2006, background): “Aspects of the Bloem and La Heij (2003) and Bloem et al. (2004) experiments raise questions about the ability of their model to account for bilingual performance more generally.”
• Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access (2005, background): “More recently, Bloem and La Heij (2003, see also Bloem, van der Boogard & La Heij, 2004 ) proposed a model in which only the conceptual representation included in the preverbal message (the one selected for production) passes activation to the lexical level (see also Damian & Bowers, 2003).”