Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access

186 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. (2008, unknown): “, ‘button’), it is found that that naming latencies are faster in the phonologically related condition (hammock – hammer) than in the phonologically unrelated condition (hammock – button) (e.g., Morsella and Miozzo, 2002; Navarrete and Costa, 2005).”
The dynamics of bilingual lexical access (2006, background): “Starreveld and La Heij, 1995, 1996; Caramazza, 1997; Rapp and Goldrick, 2000; Navarrete and Costa, 2005 ) assume that any activated lexical representation spreads some activation to its phonological segments.”
Planning in sentence production: evidence for the phrase as a default planning scope. (2010, unknown): “The retrieval fluency hypothesis could be used to explain Smith and Wheeldon’s (1999) finding of shorter onset latencies for sentences beginning with a simple noun phrase because the second content word of the simple– complex condition was always the verb ‘‘moves,” while the second content word of s”
The cortical dynamics of speaking: present shortcomings and future avenues (2016, background): “…1935) where distractor information which a speaker does not intend to verbalise nonetheless influences the speed of target naming (e.g. Bles & Jansma, 2008; Costa & Caramazza, 2002; Glaser & Glaser, 1989; Levelt et al., 1991; Morsella & Miozzo, 2002; Navarrete & Costa, 2005; Roelofs, 1992).”