Equimolar Production of Amyloid β-Protein and Amyloid Precursor Protein Intracellular Domain from β-Carboxyl-terminal Fragment by γ-Secretase*

By N. Kakuda, S. Funamoto, Sousuke Yagishita, Mako Takami, S. Osawa, N. Dohmae, Y. Ihara. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 2006

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We showed previously that cells expressing wild-type (WT) β-amyloid precursor protein (APP) or coexpressing WTAPP and WT presenilin (PS) 1/2 produced APP intracellular domains (AICD) 49-99 and 50-99, with the latter predominating. On the other hand, the cells expressing mutant (MT) APP or coexpressing WTAPP and MTPS1/2 produced a greater proportion of AICD-(49-99) than AICD-(50-99). In addition, the expression of amyloid β-protein (Aβ) 49 in cells resulted in predominant production of Aβ40 and that of Aβ48 leads to preferential production of Aβ42. These observations suggest that ϵ-cleavage and γ-cleavage are interrelated. To determine the stoichiometry between Aβ and AICD, we have established a 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-2-hydroxy-1-propanesulfonic acid-solubilized γ-secretase assay system that exhibits high specific activity. By using this assay system, we have shown that equal amounts of Aβ and AICD are produced from β-carboxyl-terminal fragment (C99) by γ-secretase, irrespective of WT or MTAPP and PS1/2. Although various Aβ species, including Aβ40, Aβ42, Aβ43, Aβ45, Aβ48, and Aβ49, are generated, only two species of AICD, AICD-(49-99) and AICD-(50-99), are detected. We also have found that M233T MTPS1 produced only one species of AICD, AICD-(49-99), and only one for its counterpart, Aβ48, in contrast to WT and other MTPS1s. These strongly suggest thatϵ-cleavage is the primary event, and the produced Aβ48 and Aβ49 rapidly undergo γ-cleavage, resulting in generation of various Aβ species.

Subfields: Cell Biology, Molecular Biology, Physiology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a63ac58b51948d3e217f9254078f2cc1334ca87

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cell Biology

  1. D. Selkoe

In Molecular Biology

  1. D. Selkoe
  2. D. Walsh
  3. David Watson
  4. Sokratis G. Papageorgiou
  5. K. Yiannopoulou

In Physiology

  1. D. Selkoe
  2. D. Walsh
  3. L. Mucke
  4. D. Holtzman
  5. J. Palop
  6. David Watson
  7. Michael T. Heneka
  8. G. Bu

Citations in the corpus