Factorial Survey Methods for Studying Beliefs and Judgments

By G. Jasso. 2006

442 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/5a2b1d1d17f734c100d549aa7c8714d9eabcc2f1

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In General Decision Sciences

1. A. Bartczak
2. S. Liebig
3. Dan Su
4. Katrin Auspurg
5. Kuang-Wei Wen
6. Peter M. Steiner
7. T. Hinz
8. Yan-Chuan Chen

In Social Psychology

1. Katrin Auspurg
2. A. Bartczak
3. Dan Su
4. Kuang-Wei Wen
5. Peter M. Steiner
6. T. Hinz
7. Yan-Chuan Chen
8. U. Liebe

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Katrin Auspurg
2. U. Liebe
3. A. Bartczak
4. J. Meyerhoff
5. Dan Su
6. C. Sauer
7. Peter M. Steiner
8. C. Atzmüller

Citations in the corpus

• A Turbine is not only a Turbine: The Role of Social Context and Fairness Characteristics for the Local Acceptance of Wind Power (2017, methodology): “In multivariate regression analyses the evaluations are included as dependent variables and the factors/situational attributes as independent variables (e.g., Jasso, 2006).”
• Experimental Vignette Studies in Survey Research (2010, methodology): “Within factorial surveys, vignette subpopulations are selected by a random procedure rather than according to an experimental design (Jasso, 2006; Rossi & Anderson, 1982).”
• Designing Valid and Reliable Vignette Experiments for Survey Research: A Case Study on the Fair Gender Income Gap (2017, methodology): “We briefly discuss two methods for analyzing vignette data: Analysis of variance (ANOVA) with random respondent effects and multilevel modeling with vignettes as level-one units and respondents as level-two units (for other analytic approaches see Jasso, 2006).”
• The Application of Factorial Surveys in General Population Samples: The Effects of Respondent Age and Education on Response Times and Response Consistency (2011, background): “de tributes (dimensions) vary systematically in their values (levels) (Jasso 2006).”
• Organizations' Information Security Policy Compliance: Stick or Carrot Approach? (2012, methodology): “We chose a design of multiple scenarios per respondent because each scenario is associated with a relatively small number of survey items [36].”
• A New Model of Wage Determination and Wage Inequality (2009, unknown): “As a quick prelude to future work, we cast into wage-model matrix form one of the factorial survey data decks analyzed in Jasso (2006b) – where 23 respondents each form a just earnings amount for each of 20 fictitious workers, generating 23 recommended wage distributions and 253 covariances.”
• Migration Decisions Within Dual‐Earner Partnerships: A Test of Bargaining Theory (2010, background): “The key idea in this design is that the respondents react to hypothetical descriptions of situations or objects (i.e., vignettes) instead of answering single-item questions (see Jasso, 2006; Rossi & Anderson, 1982).”