Relating Brain Structures To Open-Ended Descriptions Of Cognition

By Jérôme Dockès, Olivier Grisel, Joan Massich, Fabian M. Suchanek, Bertrand Thirion, Gaël Varoquaux. 2017

1,120 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/587bc16db2eb45ceed7bac0c330916a9c067032f

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

The Domain of Organizational Cognitive Neuroscience (2012, background): “Indeed, in the latter case it is more common to use the reverse inference model (Poldrack, 2006).”
Biology and Management: A Review, Critique, and Research Agenda (2018, background): “, 2016), (c) small effect sizes, (d) endogeneity issues, (e) experimental conditions in neuroscientific experiments, and (f) issues of reverse inference in fMRI studies (Poldrack, 2006).”
Architectural design and the brain: effects of ceiling height and perceived enclosure on beauty judgments and approach-avoidance decisions (2015, background): “In turn, the quality of the inferences one draws from the observation of these activations is proportional to the functional specificity associated with the region under consideration (see Bub, 2000; Poldrack, 2006).”
Using EEG to Predict Consumers’ Future Choices (2015, background): “However, it is important to emphasize that each frequency band can be associated with many cognitive processes, so whether a particular mental process is active cannot be concluded from simply examining changes in a specific frequency band (Poldrack 2006).”
Interpreting and improving natural-language processing (in machines) with natural language-processing (in the brain) (2019, background): “This “reverse inference" can lead to erroneous conclusions, as region R can be involved in more than one task (Poldrack, 2006).”
The contribution of neuroscience to consumer research: A conceptual framework and empirical review (2013, background): “Such inferences leading to the identification of a certain mental process based on the activation of a particular brain region follow a reasoning that is opposite to the one of neuroscience, which is consequently known as reverse inference (Poldrack, 2006).”
A Primer on Pattern-Based Approaches to fMRI: Principles, Pitfalls, and Perspectives. (2015, unknown): “For limited data, this inverse inference is problematic (Poldrack, 2006); however, if the full p(rjs) is known, then p(sjr) can be obtained according to Bayes’ rule as follows: pðsjrÞ=pðrjsÞpðsÞ=pðrÞ: (Equation 1) This can be transformed to pðsjrÞfpðrjsÞpðsÞ; (Equation 2) because for a given brain…”
The neuropsychology of consumer behavior and marketing (2018, background): “” A reverse inference occurs when one reasons backwards from observed brain activity to cognitive process (Poldrack, 2006).”
Emotion and the Prefrontal Cortex: An Integrative Review (2017, background): “Since the publication of this study, the neuroscientific literature has become filled with studies employing reverse inference (Poldrack, 2006) and assuming that activation in this network reflects salience detection.”