Gender selection discrimination: Evidence from a Trust game

115 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Gender Differences in Trust Dynamics: Women Trust More than Men Following a Trust Violation (2014, background): “, Ashraf, Bohnet, & Piankov, 2003; Croson & Buchan, 1999) or a tendency for men to exhibit more trust than women (e.g., Buchan, Croson, & Solnick, 2008; Chaudhuri & Gangadharan, 2003; Innocenti & Pazienza, 2006; Slonim, 2004), this research has primarily focused on one-shot interactions.”
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis (2013, methodology): “Another variant of the investment game is used by Slonim and Guillen (2010) in dealing with gender preferences in group member selection.”
Trust games: A meta-analysis (2011, background): “…6.49 66 3 U U U U Simpson and Eriksson (2009) USA 24 10.00 52 3 U U U Simpson, McGrimmon et al. (2007) United States 147 6.00 59 114 3 U U U U Slonim and Guillen (2010) USA 56 30.00 44 3 U U U U U U Solnick (2007) USA 30 10.00 69 63 3 U U U U U Solnick (2007) USA 30 10.00 62 137 3 U U U U U…”