Connected: The Surprising Power of Our Social Networks and How They Shape Our Lives

By Susan K. Walker. 2011

829 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Demography, Social Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Demography

In Social Psychology

Citations in the corpus

How algorithmic popularity bias hinders or promotes quality (2017, background): “Furthermore, knowledge of what is popular can be construed as a form of social influence; an individual’s behavior may be guided by choices of peers or neighbors [20, 16, 17, 15, 26, 2, 6].”
Customer-to-Customer Interactions: Broadening the Scope of Word of Mouth Research (2010, background): “Looking at other disciplines, we have more evidence that quitting certain behaviors , such as smoking, is a social phenomenon in which people are affected by their social network (Christakis and Fowler 2009).”
Do social explanations work?: studying and modeling the effects of social explanations in recommender systems (2013, background): “We build on existing work that shows the value of explaining recommendations in general and the growing trend to use social information in recommender systems for both preference modeling and explanation.”
Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks (2017, background): “Thus, we often develop similar ideas and intuitions as others because we are socially connected to them (6).”
The second wave of digital-era governance: a quasi-paradigm for government on the Web (2013, background): “So developments such as analysing ‘big data’ from transactional processes [32], peer production [33], the ‘democratization of innovation’ [34], ‘crowdsourcing’ [35], ‘wikinomics’ [36], ‘cognitive surplus’ [37] and ‘network effects’ [38] put pressure on government organizations to innovate in catch-u”
Feasible Options for Behavior Change Toward More Effective Ocean Literacy: A Systematic Review (2019, background): “Although research on social networks demonstrates that whenever we get one person to make a change, it “will likely lead others to make a change, and we are more successful than we think,” some people—namely, opinion leaders and “connectors”—are linked to and can reach out to many more people than o”
Adaptation, Learning, and Optimization over Networks (2014, background): “They are also well-suited to model several forms of complex behavior exhibited by biological [16, 50, 131, 147] and social networks [15, 77, 92, 121, 230] such as fish schooling [188], prey-predator maneuvers [105, 171], bird formations [110, 119], bee swarming [12, 22, 125, 220], bacteria motility ”
Association Between Social Networks and Subjective Well-Being in Adolescents: A Systematic Review (2020, background): “In an “in-person” network for example, it will consider the relationships between the persons within the network whether they be family, neighbors, coworkers, or classmates (Christakis & Fowler, 2009).”
Implicit stereotypes and the predictive brain: cognition and culture in “biased” person perception (2017, background): “The complex dynamics of the individual within a social network (for example, Christakis and Fowler, 2009) needs to be considered in investigating the formation, transmission and maintenance of implicit stereotypes.”
Distinguishing between Personal Preferences and Social Influence in Online Activity Feeds (2016, background): “Influence has also captured the popular imagination, as a powerful force that makes content spread virally through a social network [26, 16].”
The Spread of Evidence-Poor Medicine via Flawed Social-Network Analysis (2010, background): “Their conclusions have also been disseminated via a popular book [7], which has been translated into twenty languages.”
Detecting Emotional Contagion in Massive Social Networks (2014, background): “As a result, we may see greater spikes in global emotion that could generate increased volatility in everything from political systems to financial markets [36].”
Dispositional Optimism and the Emergence of Social Network Diversity (2012, background): “In addition to providing formative connections to significant others, networks transmit attitudes, emotions, and even health outcomes (Fowler and Christakis 2008; Christakis and Fowler 2009), all of which can potentially impact optimism over time.”
Personality and Political Attitudes: Relationships across Issue Domains and Political Contexts (2010, background): “…of environment-specific effects suggests that the link between personality and attitudes is likely to be a function of features of political environments such as social networks that are of growing interest across the social sciences (see, e.g., Christakis and Fowler 2009; Heaney and McClurg 2009).”
Sharing with Friends versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence (2016, background): “…social media Online Supplement : http:dx.doi.org/10.1509/jmr.13.0312 Sharing with Friends Versus Strangers: How Interpersonal Closeness Influences Word-of-Mouth Valence Social transmission of information is a primary vehicle of economic, political, and cultural change (Christakis and Fowler 2009).”
Statistical physics of human cooperation (2017, background): “Despite their dissimilarity with social networks that describe how we are actually connected with one another [163,164], lattices enjoy remarkable popularity in human cooperation research [100,153], with the square lattice also being used for the seminal discovery of network reciprocity [31].”