A link between ecological diversity indices and measures of biodiversity.

By J. Izsák, L. Papp. 2000

161 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57c156e31b8618f85418dc3aa52264d7b756ca0e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Global and Planetary Change

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

Citations in the corpus

The apportionment of quadratic entropy: a useful alternative for partitioning diversity in ecological data (2005, unknown): “Several ecologists have recently rediscovered Rao’s work and have suggested applying quadratic entropy to their particular ecological data (Izsak and Papp, 1995; Watve and Gangal, 1996; Izsak and Papp, 2000; Shimatani, 2001; Champely and Chessel, 2002; Izsak and Szeidl, 2002).”
Measuring diversity: the importance of species similarity. (2012, background): “Some diversity indices depend only on species similarity, ignoring abundance (Faith 1992, Solow and Polasky 1994, Izsák and Papp 2000, Petchey and Gaston 2002).”
Phylogenetic diversity: a quantitative framework for measurement of priority and achievement in biodiversity conservation (2002, background): “…PD, and related taxonomic measures (e.g. Vane-Wright, Humphries & Williams, 1991; Crozier, 1992; Crozier & Kusmierski, 1994; Humphries et al., 1995; Izsák & Papp, 2000; and references therein), into the area of environmental monitoring and assessment, where the emphasis is not on choosing species…”
A guide to phylogenetic metrics for conservation, community ecology and macroecology (2016, unknown): “…details can be found in Appendix S1 (metrics from Colless, 1982; Rao, 1982; Faith, 1992; Weiher & Keddy, 1995; Clarke & Warwick, 1998, 2001; Izsák & Papp, 2000; Pybus & Harvey, 2000; Barker, 2002; Izsák & Szeidl, 2002; Webb et al., 2002; Redding, 2003; Lozupone & Knight, 2005; Pavoine,…”
On measuring pedodiversity (2007, methodology): “In ecology, criticisms have been made on the use of conventional diversity indices which only consider the abundance, and do not include the information on the taxonomic relationships between the species (Clarke and Warwick, 1998; Izsák and Papp, 2000; Ricotta and Avena, 2003; Ricotta, 2005).”
Phylogenetic diversity, trait diversity and niches: species assembly of ferns along a tropical elevational gradient (2011, methodology): “…species, several authors have suggested taking the length of the branches of a taxonomic cladogram (e.g. Vane-Wright et al., 1991; Faith, 1992, 1995), but unfortunately such fully resolved cladograms are rarely available (Crozier, 1992; Izsák & Papp, 2000; Ricotta, 2005; Schweiger et al., 2008).”
Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach (2011, background): “This property which is rooted in the use of species richness as a measure of ecological diversity is considered by many as an absolute requirement for an appropriate index of diversity (e.g. Izsak & Papp, 2000; Ricotta, 2006; Petchey & Gaston, 2007).”
Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. (2003, methodology): “These include the dissimilarity - based index ( D mean ) of Watve and Gangal [ 30 ] , the quadratic entropy index ( Q ) of Izsa ¤k and Papp [ 35 ] and the phylogenetic moment measure ( M R ) of Horn et al .”
Rao's quadratic entropy as a measure of functional diversity based on multiple traits (2005, methodology): “In this field numerous methods were developed based on topology (Vane-Wright et al. 1991) and branch length (Faith 1992, 1994) of cladograms or dendrograms, or based on raw (phylo)genetic distances between species (Izsák & Papp 2000; Ricotta 2002, 2004).”
A note on functional diversity measures (2005, methodology): “Also, if all species are equally abundant (i.e., pj ¼ 1=S) and the interspecies distances dij are constructed using an S t matrix of t functional traits, Q can be written in the form: FAD/S2 (see Izsák & Papp, 2000; Ricotta, 2002).”