Thinking and deciding, 3rd ed.

By J. Baron. 2000

286 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/57af8df80d9ad006427eefd5a374a93ba7a3880a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Paradigm Shift in Business Education: A Competence-Based Approach (2020, background): “They play a decisive role in decision-making [56] and creating a certain attitude.”
Heuristics and Biases as Measures of Critical Thinking: Associations with Cognitive Ability and Thinking Dispositions (2008, unknown): “…of effects studied in the heuristics and biases literature, which has a 30-year history in cognitive psychology (Evans, 1989, 2007; Evans & Over, 1996; Gilovich, Griffin, & Kahneman, 2002; Kahneman, 2003; Kahneman & Tversky, 1973, 1996, 2000; Over, 2004; Tversky & Kahneman, 1974, 1983, 1986).”
Nudge to Health: Harnessing Decision Research to Promote Health Behavior (2013, background): “Meanwhile, research on decision making indicates that decision makers are often irrational, or biased, in the sense that their behavior deviates systematically from normative principles that would maximize their goal satisfaction, or utility (Baron, 2000; Baron, 2004).”
CONFIDENCE AND COGNITIVE TEST PERFORMANCE (2007, background): “For instance, Baron (2000) argued that “appropriate confidence is, in most cases, a more realistic goal than certainty” (p.”
Counterfactual thinking: The temporal order effect (2004, background): “…suggests that the way in which a scenario is described can have a dramatic effect on the counterfactual thoughts that people generate (somewhat akin to the effects of “framing” an option as a loss or a gain, on people’s preferences for risk seeking and risk aversion; see Baron, 2000, for a review).”
Natural myside bias is independent of cognitive ability (2007, background): “…that it is important for a critical thinker to be able to decouple their prior beliefs and opinions from the evaluation of evidence and arguments (Baron, 1991, 2000; Evans, 2002; Correspondence should be addressed to Richard F. West, Department of Psychology, James Madison University,…”
The goal construct in social psychology. (2007, background): “…theory, MAUT) entails that when people want to make a single choice in a way that will meet several goals (e.g., ordering food that is healthy, tasty and not too expensive), they should integrate these various goals by weighing their relative importance (e.g., Baron, 2000; Keeney & Raiffa, 1976).”
STRENGTHS OF CHARACTER AND WELL-BEING (2004, background): “…hope (Snyder, 2000), kindness (Taylor et al., 2000), gratitude (Emmons & Hill, 2001), forgiveness (McCullough, 2000), open–mindedness (Baron, 2000), curiosity (Loewenstein, 1994), and so on—would say that the specific strength on which they focus in their research is the most…”
A Comparison of Models Describing the Impact of Moral Decision Making on Investment Decisions (2008, background): “A philosophical concept of such rules that allows implementing moral considerations into economic theory is utilitarianism (Baron, 2000).”
On the failure of cognitive ability to predict myside and one-sided thinking biases (2008, background): “…manner and the ability to take multiple perspectives when thinking about a problem are reasoning skills that are deemed of pre-eminent importance (Baron, 1991, 2000; Evans, 2002, 2007; Kuhn, 1999, 2001; Nickerson, 2004; Norris & Ennis, 1989; Paul, 1984, 1987; Perkins, 1995; Toplak & Stanovich,…”
Maximizing versus satisficing: happiness is a matter of choice. (2002, background): “…of the psychological assumptions underlying rational choice theory are unrealistic and that human beings routinely violate the principles of rational choice (e.g., J. Baron, 2000; Kahneman & Tversky, 1979, 1984; Tversky, 1969; Tversky & Kahneman, 1981; for a discussion, see Schwartz, 1986, 1994).”
Temporal discounting and environmental risks: The role of ethical and loss-related concerns (2004, background): “Böhm and Pfister (in press) studied how experimental variations in the causal structure and reported outcome delay of environmental risks affected people’s risk evaluation. Whereas these studies focussed on the evaluation of single future outcomes, Guyse et al. (2002) compared preferences for future”
The Role of Explanations on Trust and Reliance in Clinical Decision Support Systems (2015, background): “In decision-making, it is important to weigh up the pros and cons, and to seek both confirming and counter-evidence [5].”
The Impact of Regret on the Demand for Insurance (2004, unknown): “Baron and Hershey (1988) did find consistent evidence that the ex-post evaluation of the quality of a decision is influenced by the favorability of the final outcomes.”