ESCAPE FRACTION OF IONIZING PHOTONS DURING REIONIZATION: EFFECTS DUE TO SUPERNOVA FEEDBACK AND RUNAWAY OB STARS

By T. Kimm, Renyue Cen. 2014

204 citations recorded by the source corpus.

The fraction of hydrogen ionizing photons escaping from galaxies into the intergalactic medium is a critical ingredient in the theory of reionization. We use two zoomed-in, high-resolution (4 pc), cosmological radiation hydrodynamic simulations with adaptive mesh refinement to investigate the impact of two physical mechanisms (supernova, SN, feedback, and runaway OB stars) on the escape fraction (fesc) at the epoch of reionization (z ⩾ 7). We implement a new, physically motivated SN feedback model that can approximate the Sedov solutions at all (from the free expansion to snowplow) stages. We find that there is a significant time delay of about ten million years between the peak of star formation and that of escape fraction, due to the time required for the build-up and subsequent destruction of the star-forming cloud by SN feedback. Consequently, the photon number-weighted mean escape fraction for dwarf galaxies in halos of mass 108–1010.5 M☉ is found to be , although instantaneous values of fesc > 20% are common when star formation is strongly modulated by the SN explosions. We find that the inclusion of runaway OB stars increases the mean escape fraction by 22% to . As SNe resulting from runaway OB stars tend to occur in less dense environments, the feedback effect is enhanced and star formation is further suppressed in halos with in the simulation with runaway OB stars compared with the model without them. While both our models produce enough ionizing photons to maintain a fully ionized universe at z ⩽ 7 as observed, a still higher amount of ionizing photons at z ⩾ 9 appears necessary to accommodate the high observed electron optical depth inferred from cosmic microwave background observations.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/366977259d234b5e4083adbdbb9f4bb0648a37b8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. L. Hernquist
  3. C. Faucher-Giguére
  4. Volker Springel
  5. E. Quataert
  6. T. Naab
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. R. Dav'e

In Nuclear and High Energy Physics

  1. P. Hopkins
  2. C. Faucher-Giguére
  3. M. McQuinn
  4. E. Quataert
  5. M. Boylan-Kolchin
  6. James S. Bullock
  7. D. Keres̆
  8. E. Ostriker

Citations in the corpus