STAR FORMATION RATES AND STELLAR MASSES OF z = 7–8 GALAXIES FROM IRAC OBSERVATIONS OF THE WFC3/IR EARLY RELEASE SCIENCE AND THE HUDF FIELDS

By I. Labbé, V. González, R. Bouwens, G. Illingworth, M. Franx, M. Trenti, P. Oesch, P. V. van Dokkum, M. Stiavelli, C. Carollo and 2 more. 2009

145 citations recorded by the source corpus.

We investigate the Spitzer/IRAC properties of 36 z ∼ 7 z850-dropout galaxies and three z ∼ 8 Y098 galaxies derived from deep/wide-area WFC3/IR data of the Early Release Science, the ultradeep HUDF09, and wide-area NICMOS data. We fit stellar population synthesis models to the spectral energy distributions to derive mean redshifts, stellar masses, and ages. The z ∼ 7 galaxies are best characterized by substantial ages (>100 Myr) and M/LV ≈ 0.2. The main trend with decreasing luminosity is that of bluing of the far-UV slope from β ∼ −2.0 to β ∼ −3.0. This can be explained by decreasing metallicity, except for the lowest luminosity galaxies (0.1L*z = 3), where low metallicity and smooth star formation histories (SFHs) fail to match the blue far-UV and moderately red H − [3.6] color. Such colors may require episodic SFHs with short periods of activity and quiescence (“on–off” cycles) and/or a contribution from emission lines. The stellar mass of our sample of z ∼ 7 star-forming galaxies correlates with star formation rate (SFR) according to log M* = 8.70(±0.09) + 1.06(±0.10)log SFR, implying that star formation may have commenced at z > 10. No galaxies are found with SFRs much higher or lower than the past averaged SFR suggesting that the typical star formation timescales are probably a substantial fraction of the Hubble time. We report the first IRAC detection of Y098-dropout galaxies at z ∼ 8. The average rest-frame U − V ≈ 0.3 (AB) of the three galaxies are similar to faint z ∼ 7 galaxies, implying similar M/L. The stellar mass density to MUV,AB < −18 is ρ*(z = 8) = 1.8+0.7−1.0 × 106 M☉ Mpc−3, following log ρ*(z) = 10.6(±0.6) − 4.4(±0.7) log(1 + z) [M☉ Mpc−3] over 3 < z < 8.

Subfields: Astronomy and Astrophysics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Instrumentation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/81a60ac8d063e9d480f12f0a3ba4f1067624607c

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Astronomy and Astrophysics

  1. L. Hernquist
  2. P. Hopkins
  3. P. V. van Dokkum
  4. Richard S. Ellis
  5. C. Conroy
  6. R. Dav'e
  7. M. Franx
  8. R. Somerville

In Electrical and Electronic Engineering

  1. R. Bouwens
  2. Richard S. Ellis
  3. D. Stark
  4. P. Oesch
  5. G. Illingworth
  6. J. Dunlop
  7. M. Franx
  8. I. Labbé

In Instrumentation

  1. P. V. van Dokkum
  2. Richard S. Ellis
  3. C. Conroy
  4. M. Franx
  5. L. Hernquist
  6. P. Hopkins
  7. I. Labbé
  8. R. Bouwens

Citations in the corpus