Methods and tools for exploring novice compilation behaviour

By Matthew C. Jadud. International Computing Education Research Workshop, 2006

322 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Introductory programming: a systematic literature review (2018, methodology): “Jadud and Henriksen [300] suggest that more computing education research studies should be easily replicable and that the tools used for data collection are often too specialised, unstable, or simply unavailable for use in replication studies.”
All syntax errors are not equal (2012, background): “errors occur much more frequently than most [4, 6].”
Syntax errors just aren't natural: improving error reporting with language models (2014, background): “The frequency and importance of syntax errors among novice and experienced programmers has been studied by numerous authors [12] [11] [10] [17] [4] [16].”
Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics in Programming: Literature Review and Case Studies (2015, methodology): “Behavior Collection of coding, compiling, debugging, and testing activities and their associated metrics that students perform [43,56,60,60,61,74,99,111]”