Seemlingly unrelated estimation and the cluster-adjusted sandwich estimator

By J. Weesie. 2000

231 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Risk perceptions, preferences and management strategies: evidence from a case study using German livestock farmers (2017, methodology): “As subjective numeracy has been shown to correlate positively with risk comprehension (Zikmund-Fisher et al. 2007), this results shows that farmers with a better understanding of probabilities and preferences for numbers are more likely to take on more insurances, trade on the commodity futures exch”
The Hausman test, and some alternatives, with heteroskedastic data (2012, unknown): “It is based on Wessie (1999), cited in Creel (2004).”
Careless responding in questionnaire measures: Detection, impact, and remedies (2020, result): “…that could be confirmed when the univariate logit estimates of the total sample (0.16 [95% CI=0.06–0.27] ) and that of subsample (0.90 [95% CI=0.66–1.13] ) were compared with see-mingly unrelated estimation (SUEST; Weesie, 1999) and proved to be significantly different, χ 2 (1) = 40.30, p < .001.”
Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory (2014, methodology): “across the criteria we used Stata’s seemingly-unrelated estimation (SUEST) procedure, which allows for cross-equation tests by combining estimates from different models (Weesie, 1999).”